This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rosenberg, J. Articles by Vugia, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rosenberg, J. Articles by Vugia, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 10 1997, 2526-2530, Vol 35, No. 10
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Are clinical laboratories in California accurately reporting vancomycin- resistant enterococci?

J Rosenberg, FC Tenover, J Wong, W Jarvis and DJ Vugia
Division of Communicable Disease Control, California Department of Health Services, Berkeley 94704, USA. jrosenbe@hwl.cahwnet.gov

In order to determine whether hospital-based clinical laboratories conducting active surveillance for vancomycin-resistant enterococci in three San Francisco Bay area counties (San Francisco, Alameda, and Contra Costa counties) were accurately reporting vancomycin resistance, five vancomycin-resistant enterococcal strains and one vancomycin- susceptible beta-lactamase-producing enterococcus were sent to 31 of 32 (97%) laboratories conducting surveillance. Each strain was tested by the laboratory's routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing method. An Enterococcus faecium strain with high-level resistance to vancomycin (MIC, 512 microg/ml) was correctly reported as resistant by 100% of laboratories; an E. faecium strain with moderate-level resistance (MIC, 64 microg/ml) was correctly reported as resistant by 91% of laboratories; two Enterococcus faecalis strains with low-level resistance (MICs, 32 microg/ml) were correctly reported as resistant by 97 and 56% of laboratories, respectively. An Enterococcus gallinarum strain with intrinsic low-level resistance (MIC, 8 microg/ml) was correctly reported as intermediate by 50% of laboratories. A beta- lactamase-producing E. faecalis isolate was correctly identified as susceptible to vancomycin by 100% of laboratories and as resistant to penicillin and ampicillin by 68 and 44% of laboratories, respectively; all 23 (74%) laboratories that tested for beta-lactamase recognized that it was a beta-lactamase producer. This survey indicated that for clinically significant enterococcal isolates, laboratories in the San Francisco Bay area have problems in detecting low- to moderate-level but not high-level vancomycin resistance. Increasing accuracy of detection and prompt reporting of these isolates and investigation of cases are the next steps in the battle for control of the spread of vancomycin resistance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kiehlbauch, J. A., Hannett, G. E., Salfinger, M., Archinal, W., Monserrat, C., Carlyn, C. (2000). Use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Guidelines for Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing in New York State Laboratories. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3341-3348 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Louie, M., Louie, L., Simor, A. E. (2000). The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. CMAJ 163: 301-309 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chen, Y.-S., Marshall, S. A., Winokur, P. L., Coffman, S. L., Wilke, W. W., Murray, P. R., Spiegel, C. A., Pfaller, M. A., Doern, G. V., Jones, R. N. (1998). Use of Molecular and Reference Susceptibility Testing Methods in a Multicenter Evaluation of MicroScan Dried Overnight Gram-Positive MIC Panels for Detection of Vancomycin and High-Level Aminoglycoside Resistances in Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 2996-3001 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Carvalho, M. D. G. S., Teixeira, L. M., Facklam, R. R. (1998). Use of Tests for Acidification of Methyl-alpha -D-Glucopyranoside and Susceptibility to Efrotomycin for Differentiation of Strains of Enterococcus and Some Related Genera. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 1584-1587 [Abstract] [Full Text]