This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sherertz, R. J. Articles by Raad, I. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sherertz, R. J. Articles by Raad, I. I.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 03 1997, 641-646, Vol 35, No. 3
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis of triple-lumen catheter infection: comparison of roll plate, sonication, and flushing methodologies

RJ Sherertz, SO Heard and II Raad
Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1042, USA.

In a recent clinical trial, 248 triple-lumen catheters were removed from patients in an intensive care unit, and their tip and subcutaneous segments were cultured by both the sonication and roll plate methods; for 191 of these catheters, flush cultures of all three catheter lumens were also performed. Previously published quantitative endpoints were used to define significant catheter colonization. By using a composite index as a definition of colonization (any of the seven types of cultures meeting quantitative criteria), sonication of the subcutaneous segment was the most sensitive at detecting colonization (58%), followed by sonication of the catheter tip (53%). Sonication of both the subcutaneous and tip segments was 20% more sensitive than sonication of an adjacent catheter segment by the roll plate method (P < 0.05). The greater sensitivity of the sonication method could be attributed to its greater ability than the roll plate method to detect catheter lumen colonization (82 versus 57%, respectively; P = 0.01). A greater number of positive catheter segment cultures were found for colonized catheters from patients with associated bacteremia than for colonized catheters from patients without bacteremia (57 versus 37%; P = 0.004), making any culture method more likely to identify them. For catheters with significant colonization of only one site, the localization was as follows: 36.7% subcutaneous segment, 36.7% catheter lumen, and 26.6% tip segment. These findings suggest that the current practice of culturing a single segment of a central vascular catheter is inadequate and needs to be reexamined. They further suggest that initial colonization of the catheter lumen and tip segments may be more important than previously thought and may require a change in thinking of strategies designed to prevent catheter infection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Boersma, R. S., Jie, K.-S. G., Verbon, A., van Pampus, E. C. M., Schouten, H. C. (2008). Thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Oncol 19: 433-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ryder, M. (2006). Evidence-Based Practice in the Management of Vascular Access Devices for Home Parenteral Nutrition Therapy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 30: S82-S93 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yucel, N., Lefering, R., Maegele, M., Max, M., Rossaint, R., Koch, A., Schwarz, R., Korenkov, M., Beuth, J., Bach, A., Schierholz, J., Pulverer, G., Neugebauer, E. A. M. (2004). Reduced colonization and infection with miconazole-rifampicin modified central venous catheters: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 1109-1115 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zurcher, M., Tramer, M. R., Walder, B. (2004). Colonization and Bloodstream Infection with Single- Versus Multi-Lumen Central Venous Catheters: A Quantitative Systematic Review. Anesth. Analg. 99: 177-182 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Raad, I., Hanna, H. A., Alakech, B., Chatzinikolaou, I., Johnson, M. M., Tarrand, J. (2004). Differential Time to Positivity: A Useful Method for Diagnosing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections. ANN INTERN MED 140: 18-25 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Farr, B. M. (2004). Catheters, Microbes, Time, and Gold Standards. ANN INTERN MED 140: 62-64 [Full Text]  
• Curtin, J., Cormican, M., Fleming, G., Keelehan, J., Colleran, E. (2003). Linezolid Compared with Eperezolid, Vancomycin, and Gentamicin in an In Vitro Model of Antimicrobial Lock Therapy for Staphylococcus epidermidis Central Venous Catheter-Related Biofilm Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3145-3148 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Prielipp, R. C., Sherertz, R. J. (2003). Skin: The First Battlefield. Anesth. Analg. 97: 933-935 [Full Text]  
• McGee, D. C., Gould, M. K. (2003). Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization. NEJM 348: 1123-1133 [Full Text]  
• Hodge, D, Puntis, J W L (2002). Diagnosis, prevention, and management of catheter related bloodstream infection during long term parenteral nutrition. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87: F21-24 [Full Text]  
• Raad, I. I., Hanna, H. A. (2002). Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections: New Horizons and Recent Advances. Arch Intern Med 162: 871-878 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Raad, I. (2000). Management of intravascular catheter-related infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 45: 267-270 [Full Text]  
• Veenstra, D. L., Saint, S., Saha, S., Lumley, T., Sullivan, S. D. (1999). Efficacy of Antiseptic-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Meta-analysis. JAMA 281: 261-267 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Darouiche, R. O., Raad, I. I., Heard, S. O., Thornby, J. I., Wenker, O. C., Gabrielli, A., Berg, J., Khardori, N., Hanna, H., Hachem, R., Harris, R. L., Mayhall, G., The Catheter Study Group, (1999). A Comparison of Two Antimicrobial-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters. NEJM 340: 1-8 [Abstract] [Full Text]