This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alfa, M. J. Articles by Harding, G. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alfa, M. J. Articles by Harding, G. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 04 1997, 862-866, Vol 35, No. 4
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Improved detection of bacterial growth in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis effluent by use of BacT/Alert FAN bottles

MJ Alfa, P Degagne, N Olson and GK Harding
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. malfa@cc.umanitoba.ca

Culture-negative peritonitis is a major complication for patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and precludes organism- specific therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare inoculation of 10 ml of CAPD effluent into BacT/Alert blood culture bottles (FAN [fastidious antimicrobic neutralizing], BacTAlert aerobic [BTA], and BacT/Alert anaerobic [BTAn] bottles) to our conventional method of using 50 ml of concentrated CAPD effluent to inoculate peptone broth bottles (BD bottles) and MacConkey agar and blood agar medium (BA-MAC). The FAN, BTA, and BTAn bottles were monitored automatically in the BacT/Alert blood culture instrument. A total of 207 CAPD effluents were studied, and in 97 bacteria were detected by at least one method. Compared to BTA bottles (79 of 97; 81.4%), BTAn bottles (78 of 97; 80.4%), and BD bottles (88 of 97; 90.7%), the single best broth medium for detecting bacterial growth in CAPD effluents was the FAN bottle (90 of 97 effluents; 92.8%). A total of 125 bacterial species were detected by any method, and the majority (91.8%) of CAPD effluents were infected with a single species. A combination of FAN and BTAn bottles detected 111 of 125 (88.8%) of all organisms, whereas a combination of BD bottles and BA-MAC detected 107 of 125 (85.6%) of all organisms. One or more organisms that would have been completely missed by the conventional method with BD bottles and BA-MAC were detected in 18 CAPD effluents. Of these 18 CAPD effluents, 6 showed no growth by the conventional method with BD bottles and BA-MAC. On the basis of our data, the most sensitive and least labor intensive method was direct inoculation of 10 ml of CAPD effluent into a FAN bottle and a BTAn bottle, which could be automatically monitored by the BacT/Alert blood culture instrument. On the basis of case definitions for peritonitis, the sensitivities and specificities of the methods with FAN and BTAn bottles and with BD bottles and BA-MAC were 81.1 and 98.8% and 74.5 and 96.5%, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Strijack, C., Harding, G. K. M., Ariano, R. E., Zelenitsky, S. A. (2004). Peritoneal Fluid Titer Test for Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48: 1719-1726 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bourbeau, P., Riley, J., Heiter, B. J., Master, R., Young, C., Pierson, C. (1998). Use of the BacT/Alert Blood Culture System for Culture of Sterile Body Fluids Other than Blood. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 3273-3277 [Abstract] [Full Text]