JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumari, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cookson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumari, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cookson, B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 04 1997, 881-885, Vol 35, No. 4
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison and application of ribosome spacer DNA amplicon polymorphisms and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for differentiation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains

DN Kumari, V Keer, PM Hawkey, P Parnell, N Joseph, JF Richardson and B Cookson
Department of Microbiology, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

Analysis of sequences in the fragments of the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region by the ribosome spacer PCR (RS-PCR) can differentiate strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We compared this technique with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for typing MRSA strains and its application during an investigation of an outbreak. A total of 180 isolates of MRSA collected from various hospital laboratories within the United Kingdom and elsewhere were typed by PFGE and RS-PCR. PFGE identified 17 different types among the 180 strains examined, and RS-PCR generated 13 different types. PFGE could detect minor genetic variations among the isolates and could identify the variants which were not discriminated by RS-PCR. Four unique strain types detected by PFGE were not detected by RS-PCR. When applied to typing the outbreak-related strains from the vascular surgery unit at the General Infirmary at Leeds, the results of RS-PCR were identical to those of PFGE. Our results have shown that RS-PCR is a rapid, inexpensive technique that is highly reproducible and almost as discriminatory as PFGE for typing MRSA isolates and should be useful in the local investigation of MRSA outbreaks.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.