Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 04 1997, 928-936, Vol 35, No. 4
Y Siegman-Igra, AM Anglim, DE Shapiro, KA Adal, BA Strain and BM Farr
Catheter-related bloodstream infections increased in incidence during the
past decade, causing significant morbidity, mortality, and excess hospital
costs. Absence of inflammation at the catheter site in most cases makes
clinical diagnosis uncertain. The relative accuracy and cost-effectiveness
of different microbiologic tests for confirming that bloodstream infection
is catheter related have remained unclear. A meta- analysis of published
studies was conducted regarding the accuracy of diagnostic test methods
using pooled sensitivity and specificity and summary receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The cost for each test was estimated
by methods published by the College of American Pathologists. Costs of
catheter replacement and antibiotic therapy for false positive results were
included in the cost per accurate test result. Twenty-two studies
evaluating six test methods met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis.
Accuracy increased in ROC analysis for catheter segment cultures with
increasing quantitation (P = 0.03) (i.e., quantitative >
semiquantitative > qualitative) largely due to an increase in
specificity. The highest Youden index (mean = 0.85) was observed with
quantitative catheter segment culture, the only method with pooled
sensitivity and specificity above 90%. For blood culture methods, there was
no statistically significant trend toward increased accuracy. The unpaired
quantitative catheter blood culture offered the lowest cost per accurate
test result but was only 78% sensitive. In conclusion, quantitative culture
was the most accurate method for catheter segment culture, and unpaired
quantitative catheter blood culture was the single most cost-effective
test, especially for long-term catheters.
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Diagnosis of vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta- analysis
Infectious Disease Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|