This Article Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Troll, H. Articles by Weiss, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Troll, H. Articles by Weiss, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jul 1997, 1701-1705, Vol 35, No. 7
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Simple differential detection of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in fresh stool specimens by sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin concentration and PCR

H Troll, H Marti and N Weiss
Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Amoebiasis is caused by two distinct species, a pathogenic form (Entamoeba histolytica) and a nonpathogenic form (Entamoeba dispar), which are morphologically identical. Although the distinction between these two species is of great clinical importance, the methods developed for this purpose either are very time-consuming or involve laborious procedures for isolation of the DNA. We report here a simple PCR method starting with fresh stool specimen that allows for the sensitive and reliable distinction between E. histolytica and E. dispar. After initial concentration by the sodium acetate-acetic acid- formalin (SAF) method and digestion with proteinase K, a 0.88-kb sequence of the multicopy 16S rRNA gene served as a target for PCR amplification. The method starting with unpreserved specimens proved to be very sensitive and was not influenced by the quick exposure to SAF fixative during the initial concentration step. However, storage in SAF fixative prior to testing resulted in a decreased sensitivity within 2 days. The detection limit of the method was as low as one copy of the 16S rRNA gene. No cross-reactivity was observed with other common intestinal protozoa. Mixed infections involving both E. histolytica and E. dispar could easily be detected at a ratio of 1:10,000 by agarose gel electrophoresis or a DNA hybridization immunoassay.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Stark, D., van Hal, S., Fotedar, R., Butcher, A., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2008). Comparison of Stool Antigen Detection Kits to PCR for Diagnosis of Amebiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1678-1681 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fotedar, R., Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2007). Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 511-532 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• STARK, D., FOTEDAR, R., VAN HAL, S., BEEBE, N., MARRIOTT, D., ELLIS, J. T., HARKNESS, J. (2007). PREVALENCE OF ENTERIC PROTOZOA IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV)-POSITIVE AND HIV-NEGATIVE MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN FROM SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 549-552 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fotedar, R., Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2007). PCR Detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii in Stool Samples from Sydney, Australia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1035-1037 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mathis, A., Weber, R., Deplazes, P. (2005). Zoonotic Potential of the Microsporidia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 423-445 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2005). Prospective Study of the Prevalence, Genotyping, and Clinical Relevance of Dientamoeba fragilis Infections in an Australian Population. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2718-2723 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roy, S., Kabir, M., Mondal, D., Ali, I. K. M., Petri, W. A. Jr., Haque, R. (2005). Real-Time-PCR Assay for Diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2168-2172 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gonin, P., Trudel, L. (2003). Detection and Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar Isolates in Clinical Samples by PCR and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 237-241 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Espinosa-Cantellano, M., Martinez-Palomo, A. (2000). Pathogenesis of Intestinal Amebiasis: From Molecules to Disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13: 318-331 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haque, R., Ali, I. K. M., Akther, S., Petri, W. A. Jr. (1998). Comparison of PCR, Isoenzyme Analysis, and Antigen Detection for Diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 449-452 [Abstract] [Full Text]