Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Jul 1997, 1734-1739, Vol 35, No. 7
JM Pawlotsky, L Prescott, P Simmonds, C Pellet, P Laurent-Puig, C Labonne, F Darthuy, J Remire, J Duval, C Buffet, JP Etienne, D Dhumeaux and E Dussaix
In patients with chronic hepatitis C, determination of hepatitis C virus
(HCV) genotype could be routinely run in the future to tailor treatment
schedules. The suitabilities of two versions of a serological, so-called
serotyping assay (Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-3 [SA1-3] and Murex
HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-6 [SA1-6]; Murex Diagnostics Ltd.), based on
the detection of genotype-specific antibodies directed to epitopes encoded
by the NS4 region of the genome, for the routine determination of HCV
genotypes were studied. The results were compared with those of a molecular
biology-based genotyping method (HCV Line Probe Assay [INNO-LiPA HCV];
Innogenetics S.A.), based on hybridization of PCR products onto
genotype-specific probes designed in the 5' noncoding region of the genome,
obtained with pretreatment serum samples from 88 patients with chronic
hepatitis C eligible for interferon therapy. Definitive genotyping was
performed by sequence analysis of three regions of the viral genome in all
samples with discrepant typing results found among at least two of the
three assays studied. In all instances, sequence analysis confirmed the
result of the INNO-LiPA HCV test. The sensitivity of SA1-3 was 75% relative
to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were
concordant with those of genotyping for 92% of the samples typeable by
SA1-3. The sensitivity of SA1-6 was 89% relative to the results obtained by
the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping
for 94% of the samples typeable by SA1-6. Overall, SA1-6 had increased
sensitivity relative to SA1-3 but remained less sensitive than the
genotyping assay on the basis of PCR amplification of HCV RNA.
Cross-reactivities between different HCV genotypes could be responsible for
the mistyping of 8 (SA1-3) and 6% (SA1-6) of the samples. Subtyping of 1a
and 1b is still not possible with the existing peptides, but discriminating
between subtypes may not be necessary for routine use.
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Serological determination of hepatitis C virus genotype: comparison with a standardized genotyping assay
Department of Bacteriology and Virology, Hopital Henri Mondor, Universite Paris XII, Creteil, France. pawlotsky@univ-paris12.fr
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|