This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silletti, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silletti, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 08 1997, 2003-2006, Vol 35, No. 8
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Microbiologic and clinical value of primary broth cultures of wound specimens collected with swabs

RP Silletti, E Ailey, S Sun and D Tang
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York 11373, USA. rsillett@dorsai.org

In order to assess the microbiologic and clinical value of primary broth culture of wound specimens collected with swabs and submitted to the laboratory in transport medium, we compared the results of primary agar culture with the results of a corresponding primary broth culture for 344 aerobic specimens and 176 anaerobic specimens. While 8.7% (45 of 520) of the specimens yielded organisms from the primary broth culture that were not recovered from the corresponding primary agar culture, only 5.0% (26 of 520) of the specimens yielded organisms from the primary broth culture other than Staphylococcus epidermidis, viridans group streptococci, and Corynebacterium spp. Moreover, the primary broth culture of only 0.6% (3 of 520) of the specimens yielded organisms not recovered from the primary agar culture that caused a change in the therapy of the patient. Our conclusion is that primary broth cultures are unnecessary for the processing of wound specimens properly collected with swabs.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tellegen, E, ter Riet, G, Sloos, J H, van Weert, H C P M (2009). Diagnosis of conjunctivitis in primary care: comparison of two different culture procedures. J. Clin. Pathol. 62: 939-941 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gibb, A. P. (1999). Plates Are Better than Broth for Recovery of Fastidious Organisms from Some Specimen Material. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 875-875 [Full Text]