This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cope, J. U.
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cope, J. U.
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, K. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 09 1997, 2262-2265, Vol 35, No. 9
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens

JU Cope, A Hildesheim, MH Schiffman, MM Manos, AT Lorincz, RD Burk, AG Glass, C Greer, J Buckland, K Helgesen, DR Scott, ME Sherman, RJ Kurman and KL Liaw
Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

The strong association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer makes it important to study HPV detection methods that may play a role in cervical cancer screening. We compared two DNA methods that are commonly used for HPV research in the United States: the MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR-based test and the first-generation Hybrid Capture tube method (HCT). Laboratory assays by each method were performed with 596 cervicovaginal specimens collected from participants in a large cohort study conducted in Portland, Oreg. Included were 499 specimens from women whose cytology was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). The overall HPV DNA positivity for known types was 22.5% by PCR compared to 13.6% by HCT. When the analysis was restricted to the 14 HPV types detectable by both methods, the sensitivity of HCT, with PCR used as the standard for HPV status, was higher for specimens from women with concurrent SILs (81.0%) than for specimens from women with normal cytology (46.7%). Among specimens testing positive by both methods, 97.2% of the time the two methods agreed on whether specimens were positive for cancer- associated HPV types. Both of these HPV test methods provide information that supplements the information provided by the Pap smear. The PCR method has higher analytic sensitivity than HCT in detecting HPV, but HCT may be helpful in identifying women with concurrent SILs.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Heim, K., Hudelist, G., Geier, A., Szedenik, H., Christensen, N. D., Concin, N., Bergant, A., Volgger, B., Czerwenka, K., Hopfl, R. (2007). Type-Specific Antiviral Antibodies to Genital Human Papillomavirus Types in Mothers and Newborns. Reproductive Sciences 14: 806-814 [Abstract]  
  • Warrino, D. E., Olson, W. C., Knapp, W. T., Scarrow, M. I., D'Ambrosio-Brennan, L. J., Guido, R. S., Edwards, R. P., Kast, W. M., Storkus, W. J. (2004). Disease-Stage Variance in Functional CD4+ T-Cell Responses Against Novel Pan-Human Leukocyte Antigen-D Region Presented Human Papillomavirus-16 E7 Epitopes. Clin. Cancer Res. 10: 3301-3308 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gharizadeh, B., Kaller, M., Nyren, P., Andersson, A., Uhlen, M., Lundeberg, J., Ahmadian, A. (2003). Viral and microbial genotyping by a combination of multiplex competitive hybridization and specific extension followed by hybridization to generic tag arrays. Nucleic Acids Res 31: e146-e146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Coker, A. L., Bond, S., Madeleine, M. M., Luchok, K., Pirisi, L. (2003). Psychosocial Stress and Cervical Neoplasia Risk. Psychosom. Med. 65: 644-651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gravitt, P. E., Burk, R. D., Lorincz, A., Herrero, R., Hildesheim, A., Sherman, M. E., Bratti, M. C., Rodriguez, A. C., Helzlsouer, K. J., Schiffman, M. (2003). A Comparison between Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Hybrid Capture 2 for Human Papillomavirus DNA Quantitation. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 12: 477-484 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bosch, F. X., de Sanjose, S. (2003). Chapter 1: Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer--Burden and Assessment of Causality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003: 3-13 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kornegay, J. R., Roger, M., Davies, P. O., Shepard, A. P., Guerrero, N. A., Lloveras, B., Evans, D., Coutlee, F. (2003). International Proficiency Study of a Consensus L1 PCR Assay for the Detection and Typing of Human Papillomavirus DNA: Evaluation of Accuracy and Intralaboratory and Interlaboratory Agreement. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1080-1086 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Trempat, P, Zenou, R C, Brousset, P (2002). The assessment of DNA and RNA preservation in liquid based cytology media. Mol. Pathol. 55: 125-125 [Full Text]  
  • Cubie, H A, Seagar, A L, McGoogan, E, Whitehead, J, Brass, A, Arends, M J, Whitley, M W (2001). Rapid real time PCR to distinguish between high risk human papillomavirus types 16 and 18. Mol. Pathol. 54: 24-29 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kónya, J., Veress, G., Juhász, A., Szarka, K., Sápy, T., Hernádi, Z., Gergely, L. (2000). Additional Human Papillomavirus Types Detected by the Hybrid Capture Tube Test among Samples from Women with Cytological and Colposcopical Atypia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 408-411 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Coutlée, F., Gravitt, P., Richardson, H., Hankins, C., Franco, E., Lapointe, N., Voyer, H., The Canadian Women's HIV Study Group, (1999). Nonisotopic Detection and Typing of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Genital Samples by the Line Blot Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 1852-1857 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Poljak, M., Brencic, A., Seme, K., Vince, A., Marin, I. J. (1999). Comparative Evaluation of First- and Second-Generation Digene Hybrid Capture Assays for Detection of Human Papillomaviruses Associated with High or Intermediate Risk for Cervical Cancer. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 796-797 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peyton, C. L., Schiffman, M., Lörincz, A. T., Hunt, W. C., Mielzynska, I., Bratti, C., Eaton, S., Hildesheim, A., Morera, L. A., Rodriguez, A. C., Herrero, R., Sherman, M. E., Wheeler, C. M. (1998). Comparison of PCR- and Hybrid Capture-Based Human Papillomavirus Detection Systems Using Multiple Cervical Specimen Collection Strategies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 3248-3254 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lorincz, A., Tang, Y.-W., Persing, D. H. (1998). Hybrid Capture. Clin. Chem. 44: 1363-1363 [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»