JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ignatius, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ignatius, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Sep 1997, 2266-2269, Vol 35, No. 9
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparative evaluation of modified trichrome and Uvitex 2B stains for detection of low numbers of microsporidial spores in stool specimens

R Ignatius, S Henschel, O Liesenfeld, U Mansmann, W Schmidt, S Koppe, T Schneider, W Heise, U Futh, EO Riecken, H Hahn and R Ullrich
Institut fur Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Infektionsimmunologie, Auguste-Viktoria-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany.

At present, the laboratory diagnosis of intestinal infections caused by microsporidia depends on the detection of the typical spores either with a modified trichrome stain (MTS) or by staining with fluorochromes. The purpose of the present study was (i) to compare staining with MTS (MTS method) and the staining with the fluorochrome Uvitex 2B (U2B method) with respect to their sensitivities and specificities, particularly in the presence of low numbers of spores, and (ii) to evaluate their reliabilities under routine laboratory conditions. First, 30 negative human stool specimens as well as 30 specimens enriched with a low concentration of microsporidial spores were examined. The U2B and MTS methods detected 27 and 30, of the positive samples, respectively (95% confidence intervals for sensitivity, 0.73 to 0.98 for the U2B method and 0.88 to 1.00 for the MTS method) without yielding false-positive results (95% confidence intervals for specificity, 0.88 to 1.00 for the MTS and U2B methods). In addition, analysis of serial dilutions of 17 stool specimens from AIDS patients containing microsporidia revealed comparable detection thresholds (P = 0.52) for both methods. Finally, 40 slides prepared from one stool specimen containing very few microsporidia and 40 negative slides were included in the routine diagnostic program during 1 month in order to monitor laboratory handling and run-to-run variations. Again, both methods exhibited comparable sensitivities (95% confidence intervals, 0.83 to 0.99 for the MTS method and 0.91 to 1.00 for the U2B method) and specificities (95% confidence intervals, 0.91 to 1.00 for the MTS and U2B methods). In conclusion, MTS and U2B methods are equally useful in the diagnosis of microsporidiosis. However, since detection thresholds for both methods differed considerably in all diluted stool specimens, performance of a combination of both methods may be more sensitive than the performance of only one procedure in the event of very low numbers of microsporidial spores.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.