This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rafferty, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shayegani, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rafferty, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shayegani, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1998, p. 2957-2963, Vol. 36, No. 10
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Restriction Enzyme Analysis, Arbitrarily Primed PCR, and Protein Profile Analysis Typing for Epidemiologic Investigation of an Ongoing Clostridium difficile Outbreak

Mary Ellen Rafferty,1 Aldona L. Baltch,1,* Raymond P. Smith,1 Lawrence H. Bopp,1 Carol Rheal,1 Fred C. Tenover,2 George E. Killgore,2 David M. Lyerly,3,dagger Tracy D. Wilkins,3 Dianna J. Schoonmaker,4 George E. Hannett,4 and Mehdi Shayegani4

Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Albany Medical College,1 and Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health,4 Albany, New York; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia2; and Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia3

Received 17 February 1998/Returned for modification 27 April 1998/Accepted 29 June 1998

During an outbreak of diarrhea in a general hospital in 1992, 166 Clostridium difficile isolates from 102 patients were typed by restriction enzyme analysis (REA), arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), and protein profile analysis (PP) techniques. A total of 18 types and 5 subtypes were identified by REA, 32 types were identified by AP-PCR, and 9 types were identified by PP. Analysis of the data indicated the presence of a predominant strain among 76, 75, and 84% of the isolates by REA, AP-PCR, and PP, respectively. Subsequently, 45 C. difficile isolates which had been collected in 1990 from 33 patients in the same hospital following a significant increase in the number of cases of diarrhea caused by C. difficile were studied by REA, AP-PCR, and PP typing techniques. Thirteen types and one subtype were identified by REA, 12 types were identified by AP-PCR, and 5 types were identified by PP. As with the isolates from 1992, a dominant strain was identified. This strain was represented by 53, 64, and 70% of the total number of isolates when the strains were typed by REA, AP-PCR, and PP, respectively. Every isolate (210 of 211) from both 1990 and 1992 that was available for typing was typeable by all three methods. Furthermore, the same dominant strain was identified in both 1990 and 1992 by each method. This study demonstrates that each of the three typing methods can be useful in epidemiologic investigations of C. difficile outbreaks and that one strain can be dominant in an institution over a number of years.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Disease Section, 111D, Stratton VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Ave., Albany, NY 12208. Phone: (518) 462-3311, ext. 3080. Fax: (518) 462-3350. E-mail: Baltch.Aldona{at}Albany.VA.gov.

dagger Present address: TechLab, Inc., Blacksburg, VA 24060.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1998, p. 2957-2963, Vol. 36, No. 10
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wroblewski, D., Hannett, G. E., Bopp, D. J., Dumyati, G. K., Halse, T. A., Dumas, N. B., Musser, K. A. (2009). Rapid Molecular Characterization of Clostridium difficile and Assessment of Populations of C. difficile in Stool Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2142-2148 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Northey, G., Gal, M., Rahmati, A., Brazier, J. S (2005). Subtyping of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 001 by REP-PCR and PFGE. J Med Microbiol 54: 543-547 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wilcox, M. H., Fawley, W., Freeman, J., Brayson, J. (2000). In vitro activity of new generation fluoroquinolones against genotypically distinct and indistinguishable Clostridium difficile isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 551-556 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Johnson, S., Samore, M. H., Farrow, K. A., Killgore, G. E., Tenover, F. C., Lyras, D., Rood, J. I., DeGirolami, P., Baltch, A. L., Rafferty, M. E., Pear, S. M., Gerding, D. N. (1999). Epidemics of Diarrhea Caused by a Clindamycin-Resistant Strain of Clostridium difficile in Four Hospitals. NEJM 341: 1645-1651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»