Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3327-3331, Vol. 36, No. 11
Medical Microbiology Division, Department of
Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa,2
and
Department of Medicine,
Received 6 April 1998/Returned for modification 6 August
1998/Accepted 18 August 1998
Genomic DNA extracted from 45 vancomycin-resistant
Enterococcus faecium (VRE) isolates was cleaved with
HindIII and HaeIII and subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis. The ability of this method (restriction
endonuclease analysis [REA]) to distinguish strains at the
subspecies level was compared with results previously determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Chart
reviews were performed to provide a clinical correlation of
possible epidemiologic relatedness. A likely clinical association was
found for 29 patients as part of two outbreaks. REA found 21 of
21 isolates were the same type in the first outbreak, with PFGE calling
19 strains the same type. In the second outbreak with eight
patient isolates, HindIII found six were the same type and
two were unique types. HaeIII found three strains were the
same type, two strains were a separate type, and three more strains
were unique types, while PFGE found three were the same type and five
were unique types. No single "ideal" method can be
used without clinical epidemiologic investigation, but any of these
techniques is helpful in providing focus to infection
control practitioners assessing possible outbreaks of nosocomial
infection.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Genomic Methods for Differentiating
Strains of Enterococcus faecium: Assessment Using Clinical
Epidemiologic Data
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: NMH Infection
Control and Prevention Project, Galter Carriage House, no. 913, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 215 East Chicago Ave., Chicago, IL
60611. Phone: (312) 926-2885. Fax: (312) 926-0051. E-mail:
epi-center{at}nwu.edu.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3327-3331, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»