Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3433-3434, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030,1 and Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kamikyo-ku, Kyoto, 602 Japan2
Received 8 April 1998/Returned for modification 3 August 1998/Accepted 18 August 1998
We compared four tests for antibodies to CagA or VacA, HelicoBlot 2.0, RIDA Blot Helicobacter, CHIRON RIBA H. pylori SIA, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using recombinant CagA. Immunoblot assays were accurate for determining Helicobacter pylori status but poor for determining CagA or VacA status (accuracy, 66 to 80% for CagA status and 34 to 67% for VacA status). None can be recommended for determining CagA or VacA status.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|