This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kacena, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gaydos, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kacena, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gaydos, C. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3624-3628, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Pooling of Urine Samples for Screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Ligase Chain Reaction: Accuracy and Application

Katherine A. Kacena,1,2 Sean B. Quinn,2 Suzanne C. Hartman,2 Thomas C. Quinn,2,3 and Charlotte A. Gaydos2,*

Division of Disease Control, International Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health,1 and Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine,2 The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,3 Maryland

Received 12 June 1998/Returned for modification 30 July 1998/Accepted 9 September 1998

The accuracy of detection of genital Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in pooled urine samples by ligase chain reaction (LCR) was examined in three populations. Firstly, urine specimens from 300 female military recruits (FMR) were tested by LCR individually and in pools of four and six. Secondly, 300 urine specimens from middle-school students (MSS) were tested individually by LCR, and then the processed specimens were stored frozen for subsequent testing in pools of 4 and 10. Thirdly, 600 frozen urine specimens from high-school students (HSS) were tested by using the LCR pooling algorithm, i.e., testing processed specimens in pools of four in one test unit dose, and retesting individual specimens from positive pools. Finally, the pooling algorithm results were compared to culture results for a subset of 344 students from the original 600 HSS from whom cervical or urethral samples were taken at the discretion of the school nurse practitioners. Compared to individual testing of specimens by LCR in the FMR population, the pooling-by-four algorithm was 100% sensitive (5 of 5) and 100% pool specific (70 of 70), and the pool-by-six algorithm was 100% sensitive (5 of 5) and 100% pool specific (45 of 45). In the MSS population, the pool-by-4 algorithm was 95.8% sensitive (23 of 24) and 100% (52 of 52) pool specific, and the pool-by-10 algorithm was 95.8% sensitive (23 of 24) and 100% (17 of 17) pool specific. In the subset of 344 HSS from whom endocervical or urethral specimens were collected for culture, 31 were positive by LCR in urine and 26 were positive by culture. After results discrepant between culture and LCR were adjudicated by a confirmatory LCR test, the pooling algorithm was 93.8% (30 of 32) sensitive and 99.7% (311 of 312) specific. Culture from these 344 HSS was 81.3% (26 of 32) sensitive. The pooling algorithm reduced the cost of the N. gonorrhoeae LCR assay by 60% compared to individual testing of the HSS specimens and was both sensitive and specific.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Johns Hopkins University, Division of Infectious Diseases, Ross Research Bldg., Room 1159, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205. Phone: (410) 614-0933. Fax: (410) 614-9775. E-mail: cgaydos{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3624-3628, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Whiley, D. M., Tapsall, J. W., Sloots, T. P. (2006). Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: An Ongoing Challenge. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 3-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lindan, C., Mathur, M., Kumta, S., Jerajani, H., Gogate, A., Schachter, J., Moncada, J. (2005). Utility of Pooled Urine Specimens for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Men Attending Public Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics in Mumbai, India, by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1674-1677 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chorba, T., Scholes, D., BlueSpruce, J., Operskalski, B. H., Irwin, K. (2004). Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Managed Care: An Inquiry and Review of Issues Affecting Service Delivery. American Journal of Medical Quality 19: 145-156 [Abstract]  
  • Kissin, D M, Holman, S, Minkoff, H L, DeMeo, L, McCormack, W M, DeHovitz, J A (2002). Epidemiology and natural history of ligase chain reaction detected chlamydial and gonococcal infections. Sex. Transm. Infect. 78: 208-209 [Abstract] [Full Text]