JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacomo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Drancourt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacomo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Drancourt, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3703-3706, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Isolation of Blood-Borne Mycobacterium avium by Using the Nonradioactive BACTEC 9000 MB System and Comparison with a Solid-Culture System

Véronique Jacomo, Didier Musso, Marie-José Gevaudan, and Michel Drancourt*

Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hygiène et Epidémiologie Hospitalière, Hopital Salvator, 13009 Marseille, France

Received 8 June 1998/Returned for modification 10 July 1998/Accepted 21 September 1998

We conducted a 12-month prospective study comparing two approaches to the detection of Mycobacterium avium in the blood of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients, namely, a lytic centrifugation system combined with Middlebrook solid culture medium (the conventional procedure) and the nonradiometric BACTEC 9000 MB system. Species identification relied on 16S rRNA probe hybridization and cell wall fatty acids chromatography. M. avium was isolated in 17 of 345 (5%) blood specimens by the BACTEC 9000 MB automated system and in 14 of 345 (4%) blood specimens by the conventional procedure (nonsignificant, chi 2 test). Detection time was 16 ± 6 days by the BACTEC 9000 MB automated system and 27 ± 3 days by the conventional procedure (P < 0.001, Student t test). Non-M. avium mycobacteria were not recovered during the study period. Contamination rate was 8% (30 specimens) by the BACTEC 9000 MB system and 0% by the conventional procedure, indicating the necessity of using an antibiotic mixture (PANTA, consisting of polymyxin B, amphotericin B, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, and azlocillin). Working time was 1 min 30 s by the BACTEC 9000 MB system and 8 min by the conventional procedure, which was 1.8 times more expensive than the BACTEC system. Use of the BACTEC 9000 MB system increased the sensitivity of M. avium detection and reduced detection time in blood culture.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hygiène et Epidémiologie Hospitalière, Hopital Salvator, Bd. de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France. Phone: 04-91-74-49-41. Fax: 04-91-74-60-44. E-mail: Michel.Drancourt{at}medecine.univ-mrs.fr.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3703-3706, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.