JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Endtz, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Verbrugh, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Endtz, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Verbrugh, H. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1998, p. 592-594, Vol. 36, No. 2
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Eight Methods To Detect Vancomycin Resistance in Enterococci

Hubert P. Endtz,1,* Nicole Van Den Braak,1 Alex Van Belkum,1 Wil H. Goessens,1 Deborah Kreft,1 A. Barnard Stroebel,2 and Henri A. Verbrugh1

Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam1 and St. Clara Hospital,2 Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 21 August 1997/Returned for modification 10 October 1997/Accepted 13 November 1997

A collection of genetically unrelated vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) including 50 vanA, 15 vanB, 50 vanC1, and 30 vanC2 VRE were used to evaluate the accuracy of eight currently available susceptibility test methods (agar dilution, disk diffusion, E-test, agar screen plate, Vitek GPS-TA and GPS-101, and MicroScan overnight and rapid panels). vanA VRE were detected by all methods. vanB VRE were often not detected by Vitek GPS-TA and MicroScan rapid (sensitivities, 47 and 53%, respectively), though the new Vitek GPS-101 was found to be a significant improvement. E-test and the agar screen were the only two methods detecting all VRE, including the vanC1/C2 VRE.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: (31)10 4635820. Fax: (31)10 4633875. E-mail: ENDTZ{at}BACL.AZR.NL.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1998, p. 592-594, Vol. 36, No. 2
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.