JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roggenkamp, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heesemann, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roggenkamp, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heesemann, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1999, p. 3711-3712, Vol. 37, No. 11
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB Systems for Recovery of Mycobacteria in a Routine Diagnostic Laboratory

Andreas Roggenkamp,* Mathias W. Hornef, Adelheid Masch, Bettina Aigner, Ingo B. Autenrieth, and Jürgen Heesemann

Max von Pettenkofer-Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany

Received 17 May 1999/Returned for modification 28 June 1999/Accepted 3 August 1999

MB/BacT, BACTEC 460 TB, and Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium were evaluated in parallel for recovery of mycobacteria from 3,700 continuous clinical specimens in a routine laboratory. Mycobacteria were identified from 123 (3.3%) specimens. The recovery rates for all mycobacteria by the different systems were 91.0, 73.0, and 53.6% for BACTEC 460 TB, MB/BacT, and LJ medium, respectively. The recovery rates for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex were 97.1, 80.2, and 67.6%, respectively. The lack of sensitivity of the MB/BacT system was more pronounced with smear-negative specimens and resulted in a failure to detect three patients with infectious tuberculosis.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Max von Pettenkofer-Institut for Hygiene and Microbiology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 9a, 80336 Munich, Germany. Phone: 49-89-51605200. Fax: 49-89-5380584. E-mail: Rogge{at}m3401.mpk.med.uni-muenchen.de.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1999, p. 3711-3712, Vol. 37, No. 11
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.