Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1999, p. 1409-1414, Vol. 37, No. 5
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multicenter Quality Assessment of PCR Methods
for Detection of Enteroviruses
Peter
Muir,1,
,*
Albert
Ras,2
Paul E.
Klapper,3,
Graham M.
Cleator,3,
Klaus
Korn,4,
Christian
Aepinus,5
Anders
Fomsgaard,6
Pierre
Palmer,7
Agneta
Samuelsson,8
Antonio
Tenorio,9
Benedikt
Weissbrich,10,
and
A.
M.
van Loon2,11,
Department of Virology, Guy's, King's College & St
Thomas' Hospitals' School of Medicine,
London,1 and Division of Virology,
Department of Pathological Sciences, Manchester Royal Infirmary,
Manchester,3 United Kingdom; Research
Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health
and the Environmental (RIVM), Bilthoven,2 and
Department of Virology, Utrecht Academic Hospital,
Utrecht,11 The Netherlands; Institute
for Clinical and Molecular Virology der
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg,
Erlangen,4 Department of Molecular
Pathology, University of Tübingen,
Tübingen,5 and Institut für
Virologie und Immunobiologie, Universität Würzburg,
Würzburg,10 Germany;
Department of Virology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen,
Denmark6; Service de Bacteriologie,
Virologie et Hygiene, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris,
France7; Clinical Virology F68,
Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden8;
and C.N.M., Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid,
Spain9
Received 17 September 1998/Returned for modification 7 December
1998/Accepted 2 February 1999
We conducted a multicenter evaluation of commercial and in-house
PCR methods for the detection of enteroviruses. Three coded panels of
test and control RNA samples, artificial clinical specimens, and
representative enterovirus serotypes were used to assess amplification methods, RNA extraction methods, and reactivities with different enterovirus serotypes. Despite several differences between PCR methods,
there was good agreement, although some variation in sensitivity was
observed. Most PCR methods were able to detect enterovirus RNA derived
from 0.01 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) and
were able to detect at least 1 TCID50 of enterovirus in
cerebrospinal fluid, stool, or throat swab specimens. Most were also
able to detect a wide range of enterovirus serotypes, although
serotypic identification was not possible. Some laboratories experienced false-positive results due to PCR contamination, which appeared to result mainly from cross-contamination of specimens during
RNA extraction. Provided that this problem is overcome, these PCR
methods will prove to be a sensitive and rapid alternative to cell
culture for the diagnosis of enterovirus infection.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Virology, Guy's, King's College & St Thomas' Hospitals' School of
Medicine, St. Thomas' Campus, Lambeth Palace Rd., London SE1 7EH,
United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 171 922 8167. Fax: (44) 171 922 8387. E-mail: p.muir{at}umds.ac.uk.
Member of the European Union Concerted Action on Virus Meningitis
and Encephalitis. Other members of the group are listed in the
Appendix.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1999, p. 1409-1414, Vol. 37, No. 5
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Loens, K., Beck, T., Ursi, D., Pattyn, S., Goossens, H., Ieven, M.
(2006). Two Quality Control Exercises Involving Nucleic Acid Amplification Methods for Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Carried Out 2 Years Apart (in 2002 and 2004).. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 899-908
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boriskin, Y. S., Rice, P. S., Stabler, R. A., Hinds, J., Al-Ghusein, H., Vass, K., Butcher, P. D.
(2004). DNA Microarrays for Virus Detection in Cases of Central Nervous System Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 5811-5818
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mulford, W. S., Buller, R. S., Arens, M. Q., Storch, G. A.
(2004). Correlation of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Cell Counts and Elevated CSF Protein Levels with Enterovirus Reverse Transcription-PCR Results in Pediatric and Adult Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 4199-4203
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lamothe, G. T., Putallaz, T., Joosten, H., Marugg, J. D.
(2003). Reverse Transcription-PCR Analysis of Bottled and Natural Mineral Waters for the Presence of Noroviruses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 6541-6549
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Knepp, J. H., Geahr, M. A., Forman, M. S., Valsamakis, A.
(2003). Comparison of Automated and Manual Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Detection of Enterovirus RNA. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 3532-3536
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Craig, M. E., Robertson, P., Howard, N. J., Silink, M., Rawlinson, W. D.
(2003). Diagnosis of Enterovirus Infection by Genus-Specific PCR and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 841-844
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Van Vliet, K. E., Muir, P., Echevarria, J. M., Klapper, P. E., Cleator, G. M., Van Loon, A. M.
(2001). Multicenter Proficiency Testing of Nucleic Acid Amplification Methods for the Detection of Enteroviruses. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3390-3392
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Young, P. P., Buller, R. S., Storch, G. A.
(2000). Evaluation of a Commercial DNA Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection of Enterovirus Reverse Transcription-PCR Products Amplified from Cerebrospinal Fluid Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 4260-4261
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yarush, L. I., Steele, R. W.
(2000). Editorial: Diagnosis and Prospective Treatment of Enteroviral Infections in Children. CLIN PEDIATR
39: 209-211