Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2158-2164, Vol. 37, No. 7
Department of Medical Microbiology and
Infectious Diseases,
Received 30 November 1998/Returned for modification 4 February
1999/Accepted 26 March 1999
Cystic fibrosis (CF) predisposes patients to bacterial colonization
and infection of the lower airways. Several species belonging to the
genus Burkholderia are potential CF-related pathogens, but
microbiological identification may be complicated. This situation is
not in the least due to the poorly defined taxonomic status of these
bacteria, and further validation of the available diagnostic assays is
required. A total of 114 geographically diverse bacterial isolates,
previously identified in reference laboratories as Burkholderia cepacia (n = 51), B. gladioli
(n = 14), Ralstonia pickettii
(n = 6), B. multivorans
(n = 2), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
(n = 3), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(n = 11), were collected from environmental, clinical,
and reference sources. In addition, 27 clinical isolates putatively
identified as Burkholderia spp. were recovered from the
sputum of Dutch CF patients. All isolates were used to evaluate the
accuracy of two selective growth media, four systems for biochemical
identification (API 20NE, Vitek GNI, Vitek NFC, and MicroScan), and
three different PCR-based assays. The PCR assays amplify different
parts of the ribosomal DNA operon, either alone or in combination with
cleavage by various restriction enzymes (PCR-restriction fragment
length polymorphism [RFLP] analysis). The best system for the
biochemical identification of B. cepacia appeared to be the
API 20NE test. None of the biochemical assays successfully grouped the
B. gladioli strains. The PCR-RFLP method appeared to be the
optimal method for accurate nucleic acid-mediated identification of the
different Burkholderia spp. With this method, B. gladioli was also reliably classified in a separate group. For
the laboratory diagnosis of B. cepacia, we recommend
parallel cultures on blood agar medium and selective agar plates.
Further identification of colonies with a Burkholderia
phenotype should be performed with the API 20NE test. For final
confirmation of species identities, PCR amplification of the
small-subunit rRNA gene followed by RFLP analysis with various enzymes
is recommended.
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of Burkholderia spp. in
the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: Comparison of Conventional and
Molecular Methods
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University
Medical Center Rotterdam EMCR, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD
Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-10-4633668. Fax: 31-10-4633875. E-mail: vanpelt{at}bacl.azr.nl.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 1999, p. 2158-2164, Vol. 37, No. 7
0095-1137/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|