JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sjöstedt, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sjöstedt, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 22-26, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparative Analysis of PCR versus Culture for Diagnosis of Ulceroglandular Tularemia

Anders Johansson,1 Lennart Berglund,2 Ulla Eriksson,3 Ingela Göransson,3 Ralfh Wollin,4 Mats Forsman,3 Arne Tärnvik,1 and Anders Sjöstedt3,5,*

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infectious Diseases,1 and Department of Clinical Microbiology, Division of Bacteriology,5 Umeå University, S-901 85 Umeå, Primary Health Care Center, S-827 25 Ljusdal,2 Department of Microbiology, Defence Research Establishment, S-901 82 Umeå,3 and Department of Bacteriology, Swedish Institute of Infectious Disease Control, S-105 21 Stockholm,4 Sweden

Received 4 May 1999/Accepted 30 September 1999

PCR and culture were comparatively evaluated for their abilities to demonstrate Francisella tularensis in wound specimens from tularemia patients during an outbreak in Sweden in 1998. For transport of the specimens used for PCR, a buffer solution containing a nuclease inhibitor was used, and for transport of the specimens used for culture, a commercial transport system was selected after experimental comparison of various systems. Of 40 patients with culture- and/or serology-verified ulceroglandular tularemia, PCR detected F. tularensis DNA in 30 (75%) patients, whereas culture detected bacterial growth in 25 (62%) patients. Compared to data from a previous study, the present inclusion of a nuclease inhibitor in the transport medium did not improve the sensitivity of the PCR, whereas the sensitivity of the culture procedure was significantly increased by selection of the system used for transport. Among eight patients with clinically suspected tularemia but with negative serology and culture, specimens from four patients showed detectable DNA. In three of these patients the diagnosis was verified by the demonstration of an F. tularensis-specific T-cell response in vitro. In conclusion, PCR was more sensitive than culture for demonstration of F. tularensis in wound specimens. Besides, we showed that tularemia may proceed without development of serum antibodies, and in these patients, PCR may be of special importance for verification of the diagnosis.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Bacteriology, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå University, S-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. Phone: 46 90 7851120. Fax: 46 90 7852225. E-mail: anders.sjostedt{at}infdis.umu.se.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 22-26, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.