This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Todd, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, B.
Right arrow Articles by Todd, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 279-281, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Importance of Inoculum Size and Sampling Effect in Rapid Antigen Detection for Diagnosis of Streptococcus pyogenes Pharyngitis

Bradley Kurtz,1 Michael Kurtz,2 Martha Roe,3 and James Todd3,4,*

Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas1; Aurora Pediatric Associates, Aurora, Colorado2; and Pathology, Children's Hospital,3 and Pediatrics and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine,4 Denver, Colorado

Received 27 May 1999/Returned for modification 19 July 1999/Accepted 25 October 1999

Current recommendations suggest that negative rapid Streptococcus pyogenes antigen tests be backed up with a culture, reflecting evidence that culture may have a higher sensitivity and also that testing of a second swab may yield a different (i.e., a positive) result because of variation in sample size or distribution. If the latter is common, the sensitivities of current antigen detection tests might be improved by simply increasing the amount of sample tested. The present study assessed the effect of antigen testing of two swabs extracted together compared to independent testing of each swab extracted separately for children with clinical pharyngitis. S. pyogenes grew from one or both swabs for 198 (37%) of 537 children. The combined culture was significantly (P < 0.05) more sensitive than culture of either swab alone. Compared to combined culture, antigen testing of two swabs extracted and tested together was significantly more sensitive than two single swab extractions (94.1 versus 80%; P = 0.03); however, the specificity was decreased (81.5 versus 89.8 to 92.7%; P < 0.05). This study suggests that sample size and/or uneven sample distribution may have influenced the apparent sensitivities of prior studies that compared antigen tests to a single plate culture. A strategy, such as the one used in the present study, that increases the sample size available for antigen testing (i.e., extraction of samples from both swabs) may improve detection rates to a level that will better approximate true disease status and obviate the need for backup cultures if specificity can be improved.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Childrens Hospital, 1056 E. 19th Ave., Denver, CO 80218. Phone: (303) 861-6983. Fax: (303) 837-2631. E-mail: todd.james{at}tchden.org.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2000, p. 279-281, Vol. 38, No. 1
0095-1137/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tanz, R. R., Gerber, M. A., Kabat, W., Rippe, J., Seshadri, R., Shulman, S. T. (2009). Performance of a Rapid Antigen-Detection Test and Throat Culture in Community Pediatric Offices: Implications for Management of Pharyngitis. Pediatrics 123: 437-444 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maltezou, H. C., Tsagris, V., Antoniadou, A., Galani, L., Douros, C., Katsarolis, I., Maragos, A., Raftopoulos, V., Biskini, P., Kanellakopoulou, K., Fretzayas, A., Papadimitriou, T., Nicolaidou, P., Giamarellou, H. (2008). Evaluation of a rapid antigen detection test in the diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis in children and its impact on antibiotic prescription. J Antimicrob Chemother 62: 1407-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fox, J. W., Cohen, D. M., Marcon, M. J., Cotton, W. H., Bonsu, B. K. (2006). Performance of Rapid Streptococcal Antigen Testing Varies by Personnel. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3918-3922 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Van Limbergen, J, Kalima, P, Taheri, S, Beattie, T F (2006). Streptococcus A in paediatric accident and emergency: are rapid streptococcal tests and clinical examination of any help?. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 32-34 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ezike, E. N., Rongkavilit, C., Fairfax, M. R., Thomas, R. L., Asmar, B. I. (2005). Effect of Using 2 Throat Swabs vs 1 Throat Swab on Detection of Group A Streptococcus by a Rapid Antigen Detection Test. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159: 486-490 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Edmonson, M. B., Farwell, K. R. (2005). Relationship Between the Clinical Likelihood of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis and the Sensitivity of a Rapid Antigen-Detection Test in a Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics 115: 280-285 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gerber, M. A., Shulman, S. T. (2004). Rapid Diagnosis of Pharyngitis Caused by Group A Streptococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 571-580 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hong, C.-Y., Lin, R. T., Tan, E. S., Chong, P.-N., Tan, Y. S., Lew, Y.-J., Loo, L.-H. (2004). Acute respiratory symptoms in adults in general practice. Fam Pract 21: 317-323 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gieseker, K. E., Roe, M. H., MacKenzie, T., Todd, J. K. (2003). Evaluating the American Academy of Pediatrics Diagnostic Standard for Streptococcus pyogenes Pharyngitis: Backup Culture Versus Repeat Rapid Antigen Testing. Pediatrics 111: e666-670 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chapin, K. C., Blake, P., Wilson, C. D. (2002). Performance Characteristics and Utilization of Rapid Antigen Test, DNA Probe, and Culture for Detection of Group A Streptococci in an Acute Care Clinic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4207-4210 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»