This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuda, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4211-4214, Vol. 38, No. 11
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Intertypic Antigenicity of Aino Virus Isolates by Dot Immunobinding Assay Using Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies

Kazuo Yoshida,* Seiichi Ohashi, Tomomi Kubo, and Tomoyuki Tsuda

Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Kyushu Research Station, National Institute of Animal Health, 2702, Chuzan, Kagoshima 891-0105, Japan

Received 31 January 2000/Returned for modification 12 May 2000/Accepted 18 August 2000

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the Aino virus were prepared, and the neutralizing epitopes of the virus were defined by competitive binding assay. Seven continuous and overlapping neutralizing epitopes existed on the G1 glycoprotein of the Aino virus. Two antigenic domains were identified and were designated I and II, with domain II consisting of six epitopes. Dot immunobinding assays (DIAs) were performed with MAbs that recognized these seven neutralizing epitopes. DIAs were performed with 1 Australian strain and 21 isolates found in Japan between the years 1964 and 1995. The MAb response patterns of all isolates were divided into four groups. The Japanese isolates did not show large differences in antigenicity, but the antigenicity of the Australian strain collected in 1968 was significantly different from that of the Japanese strains; the Australian strain lacked reactivity to three epitopes and showed only low reactivity to one epitope.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Epizootiology, Department of Exotic Disease, National Institute of Animal Health, Jusuihoncho 6-20-1, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-0022, Japan. Phone: 81-42-321-1441. Fax: 81-42-325-5122. E-mail: yoshidak{at}ed.affrc.go.jp.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2000, p. 4211-4214, Vol. 38, No. 11
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.