JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okeke, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okeke, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2000, p. 489-491, Vol. 38, No. 2
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Fluorometric Assessment of In Vitro Antidermatophytic Activities of Antimycotics Based on Their Keratin-Penetrating Power

C. N. Okeke, R. Tsuboi,* M. Kawai, and H. Ogawa

Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Received 22 March 1999/Returned for modification 28 June 1999/Accepted 5 November 1999

Keratin particles impregnated with amorolfine or clotrimazole in serial doubling dilutions (64 to 0.125 µg/ml) were used to evaluate the activities of these agents against 20 isolates each of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton rubrum in a yeast carbon broth medium incorporating Alamar Blue dye. The proposed MIC with keratin impregnation (MICK) is defined as the lowest concentration of an agent used to impregnate keratin particles that effects a fluorescence-based fungal growth quotient of 0.05 or less. The conventional colorimetric and visual MICs of amorolfine for the dermatophytes, <= 0.03 µg/ml for T. mentagrophytes and <= 0.063 µg/ml for T. rubrum, were approximately half of those of clotrimazole for the same isolates. The superiority of the MICKs of amorolfine for isolates of T. mentagrophytes (2.0 µg/ml; range, 0.5 to 8.0 µg/ml) and T. rubrum (4.0 µg/ml; range, 2.0 to 8.0 µg/ml) over those of clotrimazole (32 µg/ml [range, 8.0 to >64 µg/ml] and 64 µg/ml [range, 16 to >64 µg], respectively) may indicate the strong in vivo antidermatophytic activity of amorolfine as a topical agent. The new antidermatophytic susceptibility testing procedure has potential clinical utility for the in vitro screening of agents for use in the topical treatment of superficial mycoses.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Dermatology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan. Phone: 81-3-5802-1089. Fax: 81-3-3813-9443. E-mail: tsuboi{at}med.juntendo.ac.jp.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2000, p. 489-491, Vol. 38, No. 2
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.