Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2000, p. 696-701, Vol. 38, No. 2
Department of Epidemiology and
Biostatistics,1 and Department of
Medicine,2 University of California,
San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94105; Viral and
Rickettsial Diseases Laboratory, California Department of Health
Services, Berkeley, California 947043; and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
94143-04144
Received 13 August 1999/Returned for modification 24 September
1999/Accepted 12 November 1999
Agreement between assays for the detection of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) antibodies has been limited. In part, this disagreement has
been because assay calibration (i.e., differentiating positive from
negative results) has not been done in a standardized fashion with
reference to a wide spectrum of HHV-8-infected (true-positive) and
HHV-8-uninfected (true-negative) persons. To describe the performance
of an assay for HHV-8 antibodies more accurately, we used
epidemiologically well-characterized subjects in conjunction with
testing on two existing immunofluorescence assays for HHV-8 antibodies
to define two groups: a group of 135 HHV-8-infected individuals (true
positives), including Kaposi's sarcoma patients and those
asymptomatically infected, and a group of 234 individuals with a high
likelihood of being HHV-8 uninfected (true negatives). A new enzyme
immunoassay (EIA), using lysed HHV-8 virion as the antigen target, was
then developed. With the above true positives and true negatives as
references, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIA associated with
different cutoff values were determined. At the cutoff that maximized
both sensitivity and specificity, sensitivity was 94% and specificity
was 93%. When the EIA was used to test a separate validation group, a
distribution of seropositivity that matched that predicted for the
agent of Kaposi's sarcoma was observed: 55% of homosexual men were
seropositive, versus 6% seropositivity in a group of children, women,
and heterosexual men. It is proposed that the EIA has utility for
large-scale use in a number of settings and that the calibration method
described can be used for other assays, both to more accurately
describe the performance of these assays and to permit more-valid
interassay comparison.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Use of Epidemiologically Well-Defined Subjects and
Existing Immunofluorescence Assays To Calibrate a New Enzyme
Immunoassay for Human Herpesvirus 8 Antibodies

*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San
Francisco, 74 New Montgomery, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94105. Phone: (415) 597-9219. Fax: (415) 597-9125. E-mail:
martin{at}psg.ucsf.edu.
Present address: Departments of Microbiology and Internal Medicine,
Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|