This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1063-1065, Vol. 38, No. 3
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of the Oricult-N Dipslide for Laboratory Diagnosis of Vaginal Candidiasis

Petteri Carlson,1,* Malcolm Richardson,2 and Jorma Paavonen3

Division of Bacteriology, HUCH Diagnostics,1 and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,3 Helsinki University Central Hospital, and Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki,2 Helsinki, Finland

Received 17 August 1999/Returned for modification 27 September 1999/Accepted 1 December 1999

The Oricult-N semiquantitative dipslide (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland) was evaluated for the laboratory diagnosis of vaginal candidiasis. It was compared with broth culture (Vagicult; Orion Diagnostica). Oricult-N was positive for 14.5% of 124 symptomatic patients and 12% of 50 asymptomatic controls. The results for broth cultures were 17 and 22%, respectively. Thus, the test group and the control group did not differ significantly by either method. High vaginal yeast counts (>= 105 CFU/ml) were detected by Oricult-N in 7% of patients and in 0% of controls, but both groups harbored low numbers of yeasts. An accurate quantitative cutoff point separating a level of yeast associated with infection from vaginal yeast carriage could not be defined in the study. Nevertheless, the easy semiquantitation allowed by the Oricult-N method could be helpful because, especially in low-count carriers of Candida, other potential causes of vaginal symptoms should be considered. The Oricult-N method was technically simple and could be applied in primary health care. Further studies are required, however, before Oricult-N can be recommended as a routine diagnostic tool.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Bacteriology, HUCH Diagnostics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 402, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland. Phone: 358-9-19126250. Fax: 358-9-19126244. E-mail: petteri.carlson{at}huch.fi.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1063-1065, Vol. 38, No. 3
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Anderson, M. R., Klink, K., Cohrssen, A. (2004). Evaluation of Vaginal Complaints. JAMA 291: 1368-1379 [Abstract] [Full Text]