This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kunin, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buesching, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kunin, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buesching, W. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1187-1190, Vol. 38, No. 3
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Novel Screening Method for Urine Cultures Using a Filter Paper Dilution System

Calvin M. Kunin1,* and William J. Buesching2

Department of Internal Medicine1 and Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology,2 The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Received 10 September 1999/Returned for modification 17 October 1999/Accepted 5 December 1999

We have developed a novel method for urine culture for office practice based on the use of filter paper as a solid-phase dilution device. Filtration dilutes and spreads the inoculum onto a solid culture surface. Experiments were conducted to determine the optimum inoculum size, microbial permeability through filter papers, and ability to exclude vaginal epithelial cells. The filter paper dilution system was compared to the standard streak method to detect bacteriuria in specimens submitted to the diagnostic laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity of the filter paper dilution system for detection of high-count (>= 104 CFU/ml) gram-negative bacteriuria in 487 urine specimens were 98.2 and 97.4%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for gram-positive bacteriuria in 404 urine specimens were 91.2 and 99.2%, respectively. Low-count gram-negative bacteriuria (<104 CFU/ml) was detected by the filter paper dilution system in five of nine specimens (55.6%). In addition, the filter paper dilution system was able to detect gram-negative bacteria in 12 of 41 (29.3%) mixed cultures. Lactobacillus and Gardnerella organisms in urine specimens were excluded by the filter paper dilution system. Only three of eight Candida sp. isolates were detected at counts of >= 104 CFU/ml. The system has good storage properties and can be inoculated at the point of source without the need for refrigeration or preservatives. It should be a useful screening method for office practice, where members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci cause most infections. Standard culture methods are preferred for hospital diagnostic microbiology laboratories, where there is a need to detect yeasts and fastidious microorganisms and to isolate individual colonies from mixed cultures.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Room M110, Starling Loving Hall, 320 West 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210. Phone: (614) 293-8976. Fax: (614) 293-5627. E-mail: ckunin{at}columbus.rr.com.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2000, p. 1187-1190, Vol. 38, No. 3
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.