This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peter, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mahan, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peter, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mahan, S. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1539-1544, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Detection of the Agent of Heartwater, Cowdria ruminantium, in Amblyomma Ticks by PCR: Validation and Application of the Assay to Field Ticks

Trevor F. Peter,1 Anthony F. Barbet,2 Arthur R. Alleman,2 Bigboy H. Simbi,1 Michael J. Burridge,2 and Suman M. Mahan1,*

UF/USAID/SADC Heartwater Research Project, Harare, Zimbabwe,1 and Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-08802

Received 10 August 1999/Accepted 17 December 1999

We have previously reported that the pCS20 PCR detection assay for Cowdria ruminantium, the causative agent of heartwater disease of ruminants, is more sensitive than xenodiagnosis and the pCS20 DNA probe for the detection of infection in the vector Amblyomma ticks. Here, we further assessed the reliability of the PCR assay and applied it to field ticks. The assay detected DNA of 37 isolates of C. ruminantium originating from sites throughout the distribution of heartwater and had a specificity of 98% when infected ticks were processed concurrently with uninfected ticks. The assay did not detect DNA of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, which is closely related to C. ruminantium. PCR sensitivity varied with tick infection intensity and was high (97 to 88%) with ticks bearing 107 to 104 organisms but dropped to 61 and 28%, respectively, with ticks bearing 103 and 102 organisms. The assay also detected C. ruminantium in collections of Amblyomma hebraeum and Amblyomma variegatum field ticks from 17 heartwater-endemic sites in four southern African countries. Attempts at tick transmission of infection to small ruminants failed with four of these collections. The pCS20 PCR assay is presently the most characterized and reliable test for C. ruminantium in ticks and thus is highly useful for field and laboratory epidemiological investigations of heartwater.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Florida/ USAID/SADC Heartwater Research Project, P.O. Box CY 551, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe. Phone and Fax: 263-4-794980. E-mail: sumanmah{at}samara.co.zw.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1539-1544, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Khalesi, B., Bonne, N., Stewart, M., Sharp, M., Raidal, S. (2005). A comparison of haemagglutination, haemagglutination inhibition and PCR for the detection of psittacine beak and feather disease virus infection and a comparison of isolates obtained from loriids. J. Gen. Virol. 86: 3039-3046 [Abstract] [Full Text]