Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1592-1598, Vol. 38, No. 4
Veterans Affairs Medical
Center,1 Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention,2 Yerkes Primate
Center,3 and Emory University School
of Medicine,4 Atlanta, Georgia
Received 10 September 1999/Returned for modification 27 October
1999/Accepted 14 December 1999
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) containing the fixative mercuric chloride
is considered the "gold standard" for the fixation of ova and
parasites in the preparation of permanently stained smears of stool
specimens. However, mercuric chloride is potentially hazardous to
laboratory personnel and presents disposal problems. We compared three
new alternative, nontoxic fixatives with PVA, analyzing ease of sample
preparation and quality of smears. Sixty-eight fresh stool specimens
were divided into aliquots and placed in each of four different
fixatives: PARASAFE (PS) (Scientific Devices Laboratory, Inc., Des
Plaines, Ill.), ECOFIX (EC) (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati,
Ohio), Proto-Fix (PF) (Alpha-Tec Systems, Inc., Vancouver, Wash.), and
low-viscosity PVA fixative (PVA) (Meridian). Specimens were processed
and stained according to each manufacturer's directions. Parasites
were found in 31 of 68 slide preparations with PVA, 31 with PF, 30 with
EC, and 30 with PS. Blastocystis hominis and
Iodamoeba bütschlii were preserved in a readily
identifiable state by all methods of fixation. However, some parasites
were more easily identified with some of the fixatives because of
differences in parasite distortion. For example, Entamoeba
histolytica (Entamoeba dispar) was detected in 13 stools fixed with PF, 7 with PVA, and 6 with EC but none with PS.
Likewise, Chilomastix mesnili was identified in 13 specimens fixed with PF, 8 with EC, and 5 with PVA but only 1 with PS,
while Entamoeba coli was seen much less frequently with PS
than with the other three fixatives. A dirty background was observed in
41% of specimens prepared with PS, whereas background quality was
acceptable with other fixatives. Sample preparation was most rapid with
PS, although the EC method involved the fewest steps. In conclusion,
PVA and PF produced the least parasite distortion, while PS proved
unsatisfactory for the identification of E. histolytica,
E. coli, and C. mesnili. Both PF and EC appear
to be acceptable, environmentally safe substitutes for PVA.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Comparison of Polyvinyl Alcohol Fixative with Three
Less Hazardous Fixatives for Detection and Identification of
Intestinal Parasites
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pathology and
Laboratory Medicine Service (113), Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd., NE, Decatur, GA 30033. Phone: (404) 321-6111, ext. 2049. Fax: (404) 235-3007. E-mail: gaustin{at}emory.edu.
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|