This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Austin, G. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1592-1598, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0

Comparison of Polyvinyl Alcohol Fixative with Three Less Hazardous Fixatives for Detection and Identification of Intestinal Parasites

B. Jensen,1 W. Kepley,1 J. Guarner,2 K. Anderson,1 D. Anderson,3 J. Clairmont,1 William De l'aune,1 E. H. Austin,1 and G. E. Austin1,4,*

Veterans Affairs Medical Center,1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2 Yerkes Primate Center,3 and Emory University School of Medicine,4 Atlanta, Georgia

Received 10 September 1999/Returned for modification 27 October 1999/Accepted 14 December 1999

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) containing the fixative mercuric chloride is considered the "gold standard" for the fixation of ova and parasites in the preparation of permanently stained smears of stool specimens. However, mercuric chloride is potentially hazardous to laboratory personnel and presents disposal problems. We compared three new alternative, nontoxic fixatives with PVA, analyzing ease of sample preparation and quality of smears. Sixty-eight fresh stool specimens were divided into aliquots and placed in each of four different fixatives: PARASAFE (PS) (Scientific Devices Laboratory, Inc., Des Plaines, Ill.), ECOFIX (EC) (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio), Proto-Fix (PF) (Alpha-Tec Systems, Inc., Vancouver, Wash.), and low-viscosity PVA fixative (PVA) (Meridian). Specimens were processed and stained according to each manufacturer's directions. Parasites were found in 31 of 68 slide preparations with PVA, 31 with PF, 30 with EC, and 30 with PS. Blastocystis hominis and Iodamoeba bütschlii were preserved in a readily identifiable state by all methods of fixation. However, some parasites were more easily identified with some of the fixatives because of differences in parasite distortion. For example, Entamoeba histolytica (Entamoeba dispar) was detected in 13 stools fixed with PF, 7 with PVA, and 6 with EC but none with PS. Likewise, Chilomastix mesnili was identified in 13 specimens fixed with PF, 8 with EC, and 5 with PVA but only 1 with PS, while Entamoeba coli was seen much less frequently with PS than with the other three fixatives. A dirty background was observed in 41% of specimens prepared with PS, whereas background quality was acceptable with other fixatives. Sample preparation was most rapid with PS, although the EC method involved the fewest steps. In conclusion, PVA and PF produced the least parasite distortion, while PS proved unsatisfactory for the identification of E. histolytica, E. coli, and C. mesnili. Both PF and EC appear to be acceptable, environmentally safe substitutes for PVA.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service (113), Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd., NE, Decatur, GA 30033. Phone: (404) 321-6111, ext. 2049. Fax: (404) 235-3007. E-mail: gaustin{at}emory.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2000, p. 1592-1598, Vol. 38, No. 4
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0