Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2000, p. 2261-2266, Vol. 38, No. 6
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie, Faculteit
Wetenschappen, Universiteit Gent, Ghent,
Belgium1; Danish Veterinary Laboratory,
Copenhagen, Denmark2; and Department of
Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
University of Helsinki, Finland3
Received 23 December 1999/Returned for modification 3 March
2000/Accepted 27 March 2000
Whole-cell protein electrophoresis and biochemical examination by
means of a panel of 64 tests were used to identify 14 putative helicobacters to the species level. The results were confirmed by means
of DNA-DNA hybridization experiments and were used to discuss
misidentification of helicobacters based on 16S rRNA gene sequence
data. The data indicated that comparison of near-complete 16S ribosomal
DNA sequences does not always provide conclusive evidence for species
level identification and may prove highly misleading. The data also
indicated that "Helicobacter westmeadii" is a junior
synonym of Helicobacter cinaedi and that
Helicobacter sp. strain Mainz belongs to the same species.
H. cinaedi occurs in various animal reservoirs, including
hamsters, dogs, cats, rats, and foxes. Appropriate growth conditions
and identification strategies will be required to establish the genuine
significance of this widely distributed Helicobacter species.
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Misidentifying Helicobacters: the
Helicobacter cinaedi Example
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratorium
voor Microbiologie, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Phone: (32)9.264.51.13. Fax: (32)9.264.50.92. E-mail:
Peter.Vandamme{at}rug.ac.be.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|