This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiehlbauch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlyn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiehlbauch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Carlyn, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2000, p. 3341-3348, Vol. 38, No. 9
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Guidelines for Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing in New York State Laboratories

Julia A. Kiehlbauch,1 George E. Hannett,1 Max Salfinger,1,2,* Wendy Archinal,1 Catherine Monserrat,1,3,dagger and Cynthia Carlyn1,3,Dagger

Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health,1 and Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College,2 Albany, New York, and Association of Public Health Laboratories/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Emerging Infectious Disease Fellowship Program, Washington, D.C.3

Received 6 March 2000/Returned for modification 12 May 2000/Accepted 22 June 2000

Accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing is vital for patient care and surveillance of emerging antimicrobial resistance. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) outlines generally agreed upon guidelines for reliable and reproducible results. In January 1997 we surveyed 320 laboratories participating in the New York State Clinical Evaluation Program for General Bacteriology proficiency testing. Our survey addressed compliance with NCCLS susceptibility testing guidelines for bacterial species designated a problem (Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species) or fastidious (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae) organism. Specifically, we assessed compliance with guidelines for inoculum preparation, medium choice, number of disks per plate, and incubation conditions for disk diffusion tests. We also included length of incubation for S. aureus and Enterococcus species. We found overall compliance with the five characteristics listed above in 80 of 153 responding laboratories (50.6%) for S. aureus and 72 of 151 (47.7%) laboratories for Enterococcus species. The most common problem was an incubation time shortened to less than 24 h. Overall compliance with the first four characteristics was reported by 92 of 221 (41.6%) laboratories for S. pneumoniae, 49 of 163 (30.1%) laboratories for H. influenzae, and 11 of 77 (14.3%) laboratories for N. gonorrhoeae. Laboratories varied from NCCLS guidelines by placing an excess number of disks per plate. Laboratories also reported using alternative media for Enterococcus species, N. gonorrhoeae, and H. influenzae. This study demonstrates a need for education among clinical laboratories to increase compliance with NCCLS guidelines.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Wadsworth Center New York State Department of Health, P.O. Box 509, Albany, NY 12201-0509. Phone: (518) 474-2196. Fax: (518) 474-6964. E-mail: salfinger{at}wadsworth.org.

dagger Present address: Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131.

Dagger Present address: Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Disease, Samuel Stratton Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2000, p. 3341-3348, Vol. 38, No. 9
0095-1137/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Counts, J. M., Astles, J. R., Tenover, F. C., Hindler, J. (2007). Systems Approach to Improving Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Laboratories in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2230-2234 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ramani, R., Chaturvedi, V. (2003). Proficiency Testing Program for Clinical Laboratories Performing Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Pathogenic Yeast Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1143-1146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kahlmeter, G., Brown, D. F. J. (2002). Resistance surveillance studies--comparability of results and quality assurance of methods. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 775-777 [Full Text]  
  • (2000). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing -- How Accurate Are Our Laboratories?. Journal Watch Dermatology 2000: 10-10 [Full Text]  
  • (2000). Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing -- How Accurate Are Our Laboratories?. JWatch Infect. Diseases 2000: 2-2 [Full Text]