Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2001, p. 69-74, Vol. 39, No. 1
Department of Microbiology, The General
Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX,1 Division of
Microbiology, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2
9JT,2 and Bradford Health Authority,
Bradford BD18 3LD,4 United Kingdom, and
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
277053
Received 22 June 2000/Returned for modification 3 September
2000/Accepted 20 October 2000
Compared with solid media, broth-based mycobacterial culture
systems have increased sensitivity but also have higher false-positive rates due to cross-contamination. Systematic strain typing is rarely
undertaken because the techniques are technically demanding and the
data are difficult to organize. Variable number tandem repeat (VNTR)
analysis by PCR is rapid and reproducible. The digital profile is
easily manipulated in a database. We undertook a retrospective study of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected over an 18-month period following the introduction of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system. VNTR allele profiles were determined with early positive broth cultures and entered into a database with the specimen processing date and other specimen data. We found 36 distinct VNTR profiles in
cultures from 144 patients. Three common VNTR profiles accounted for
45% of true-positive cases. By combining VNTR results with specimen
data, we identified nine cross-contamination incidents, six of which
were previously unsuspected. These nine incidents resulted in 34 false-positive cultures for 29 patients. False-positive cultures were
identified for three patients who had previously been culture positive
for tuberculosis and were receiving treatment. Identification of
cross-contamination incidents requires careful documentation of
specimen data and good communication between clinical and laboratory
staff. Automated broth culture systems should be supplemented with
molecular analysis to identify cross-contamination events. VNTR
analysis is reproducible and provides timely results when applied to
early positive broth cultures. This method should ensure that patients
are not placed on unnecessary tuberculosis therapy or that cases are
not falsely identified as treatment failures. In addition, areas where
existing procedures may be improved can be identified.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.69-74.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid Identification of Laboratory Contamination with
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using Variable Number Tandem
Repeat Analysis
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, The General Infirmary, Great George St., Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 113 392 3929. Fax: 44 113 233 5649. E-mail:
deborahg{at}pathology.leeds.ac.uk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|