Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3578-3582, Vol. 39, No. 10
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory
Medicine and Pathology,1 and Department of
Health Sciences Research,2 Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota 55905, and PE Biosystems, Foster City,
California 944043
Received 11 January 2001/Returned for modification 14 May
2001/Accepted 16 July 2001
In a previous study which evaluated the BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.), we noted a 1.3% "instrument false-positive" rate. That is, the BACTEC system signaled that a bottle (BACTEC Plus
Aerobic/F bottle or BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle) culture was
positive but a Gram stain was negative and there was no growth of
bacteria or yeasts on subculture to chocolate agar. Furthermore, from
the same sample of blood, cultures for fungi using the Isolator blood
culture system (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) were negative for
growth. For the present study, we evaluated 76 instrument false-positive samples for the presence of 16S ribosomal DNA using the
MicroSeq 500 kit (PE Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). These samples
also were negative for fungi by the Isolator method. This kit has a PCR
module and sequencing module for the amplification and sequencing of
the 16S RNA gene and provides a database for sequence alignment and
identification of bacteria. To optimize the assay, we evaluated
the effect of adding 0.5% bovine serum albumin to the sample from
blood culture bottles and found that it decreased the effects of
inhibitors on the PCR. Two control groups of blood culture specimens
were also evaluated. One group (n = 45) were
"instrument true positives"; the instrument signaled positive, and
subsequent Gram stains were positive and subcultures on chocolate agar
grew bacteria. The other group (n = 20) were "instrument true negatives"; the instrument signaled negative, the
Gram stain was negative, and subcultures on chocolate agar and from the
Isolator tube on fungal media showed no growth. None of the 76 instrument false-positive samples had evidence for 16S rRNA gene
sequences. All of the instrument true-positive samples and all
of the instrument true-negative specimens were positive and negative,
respectively, using the MicroSeq 500 kit. Total peripheral white blood
cell counts were statistically significantly higher for patients who
had instrument false-positive results than for patients who had
instrument true-positive or true-negative results
(P = 0.001). We conclude that instrument false
positives signaled by the BACTEC 9240 system are not due to bacteria in the blood culture samples.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3578-3582.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Direct Identification of Bacteria from Positive Blood Cultures by
Amplification and Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene: Evaluation of
BACTEC 9240 Instrument True- Positive and False-Positive
Results


*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hilton 470B, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: (507) 284-2901. Fax: (507) 284-4272. E-mail: cockerill.franklin{at}mayo.edu
Present address: Department of Pathology, Yamins 309, Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215.
Present address: Departments of Medicine and Pathology,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2605.
§
Present address: Infectious Disease Research Institute/Corixa
Corporation, Seattle, WA 98104.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|