Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2001, p. 3672-3677, Vol. 39, No. 10
School and Graduate Institute of Medical Technology,
College of Medicine,1 Institute of
Epidemiology, College of Public Health,6
National Taiwan University, and Institute of Preventive Medicine,
National Defense Medical Center,4 Taipei,
Division of Epidemiology, National Institute of Preventive
Medicine,2 and Division of
Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Center for Disease
Control,3 Department of Health, The Executive
Yuan, and Department of Immunology, Tzu Chi College of
Medicine and Humanities,Hualien,5 Taiwan,
Republic of China
Received 6 December 2000/Returned for modification 8 January
2001/Accepted 1 August 2001
Dengue virus (DV) was detected early in infected mosquito C6/36
cells by using indirect immunofluorescence (IF) in conjunction with
flow cytometry. Three fixation-permeabilization methods and three DV
serotype 1 (DEN-1)-specific monoclonal antibodies, 8-8 (anti-E),
16-4 (anti-NS1), and 15F3-1 (anti-NS1), were evaluated for the
detection of DEN-1 in infected C6/36 cells. We found that these three
monoclonal antibodies were capable of detecting DV in C6/36 cells as
early as 24 h postinoculation by using a conventional indirect IF
stain. Both 8-8 and 16-4 detected DV earlier and showed a greater
number of DV-positive cells than 15F3-1. In flow cytometry, 3%
paraformaldehyde plus 0.1% Triton X-100 with 16-4, the best fixation-permeabilization method for testing DV, showed higher sensitivity (up to 1 PFU) than indirect IF stain. The higher
sensitivity of 16-4 in detecting DEN-1 was found with both IF
and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry, which had a sensitivity similar to
that of nested reverse transcription-PCR, was more sensitive in
detecting DV in the infected mosquito cells 10 h earlier than the
conventional IF stain. When clinical specimens were amplified in
mosquito C6/36 cells and then assayed for DV using flow cytometry and
conventional virus isolation at day 7 postinfection, both methods had
97.22% (35 out of 36) agreement. Moreover, among 12 positive samples which were detected by conventional culture method, the flow cytometry assay could detect DV in 58.33% (7 out of 12) of samples even at day 3 postinfection. In conclusion, both monoclonal antibodies 8-8 and 16-4 can be used for the early detection of DEN-1-infected C6/36 cells, with
16-4 (anti-NS1) being the best choice for the rapid diagnosis of DV by
both the IF staining and flow cytometry methods.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3672-3677.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Flow Cytometry Compared with Indirect
Immunofluorescence for Rapid Detection of Dengue Virus Type 1 after
Amplification in Tissue Culture
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: School and
Graduate Institute of Medical Technology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Chung-Shan S. RD, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of
China. Phone: 886-2-2312-3456, ext. 6903. Fax: 886-2-23711574. E-mail:
clkao{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|