Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3883-3888, Vol. 39, No. 11
Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine,
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford,
California1; Department of Infectious
Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y
Nutrición Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City,
Mexico2; Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New
York3; and Department of Biological
Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania4
Received 14 March 2001/Returned for modification 13 May
2001/Accepted 13 August 2001
The utility of luciferase reporter mycobacteriophages (LRPs) for
detection, identification, and antibiotic susceptibility testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis was prospectively evaluated in a clinical microbiology laboratory in Mexico City, Mexico. Five
hundred twenty-three consecutive sputum samples submitted to the
laboratory during a 5-month period were included in this study. These
specimens were cultivated in Middlebrook 7H9 (MADC), MGIT, and
Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) media. Of the 71 mycobacterial isolates
recovered with any of the three media, 76% were detected with the
LRPs, 97% were detected with the MGIT 960 method, and 90% were
detected with LJ medium. When contaminated specimens were excluded from
the analysis, the LRPs detected 92% (54 of 59) of the cultures. The
median time to detection of bacteria was 7 days with both the LRPs and
the MGIT 960 method. LRP detection of growth in the presence of
p-nitro-
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3883-3888.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Luciferase Reporter Mycobacteriophages for
Detection, Identification, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mexico
-acetylamino-
-hydroxypropiophenone (NAP)
was used for selective identification of M. tuberculosis complex (MTC) and compared to identification with BACTEC 460. Using the
LRP NAP test, 47 (94%) out of 50 isolates were correctly identified as
tuberculosis complex. The accuracy and speed of LRP antibiotic
susceptibility testing with rifampin, streptomycin, isoniazid, and
ethambutol were compared to those of the BACTEC 460 method, and
discrepant results were checked by the conventional proportion method.
In total, 50 MTC isolates were tested. The overall agreement between
the LRP and BACTEC 460 results was 98.5%. The median LRP-based
susceptibility turnaround time was 2 days (range, 2 to 4 days) compared
to 10.5 days (range, 7 to 16 days) by the BACTEC 460 method. Phage
resistance was not detected in any of the 243 MTC isolates tested.
Mycobacteriophage-based approaches to tuberculosis diagnostics can be
implemented in clinical laboratories with sensitivity, specificity, and
rapidity that compare favorably with those of the MGIT 960 and BACTEC
460 methods. The phages currently provide the fastest phenotypic assay
for susceptibility testing.
*
Corresponding author. Present address: Department of
Laboratory Medicine, UCSF, L518 Box 0134, San Francisco, CA 94143-0134. Phone: (415) 502-5324. Fax: (415) 476-9625. E-mail:
niaz{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|