Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3946-3951, Vol. 39, No. 11
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3946-3951.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus
aureus: Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods and
Analysis of mecA-Positive Susceptible
Strains
George
Sakoulas,1,*
Howard S.
Gold,1
Lata
Venkataraman,2
Paola C.
DeGirolami,2
George M.
Eliopoulos,1 and
Qinfang
Qian2
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department
of Medicine,1 and Division of Laboratory
and Transfusion Medicine, Department of
Pathology,2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Received 24 May 2001/Returned for modification 20 July
2001/Accepted 14 August 2001
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
is responsible for an increasing number of serious nosocomial and
community-acquired infections. Phenotypic heterogeneous drug
resistance (heteroresistance) to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams
affects the results of susceptibility testing. The present study
compared the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test (Denka Seiken Co.,
Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for detection of PBP 2a with agar dilution, the
VITEK-1 and VITEK-2 systems (bioMérieux, St. Louis, Mo.), and the
oxacillin agar screen test for detection of MRSA, with PCR for the
mecA gene used as the "gold standard" assay.
Analysis of 107 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates and 203 MRSA isolates revealed that the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test is superior to any single phenotype-based
susceptibility testing method, with a sensitivity of 100% and a
specificity of 99.1%. Only one isolate that lacked mecA
was weakly positive by the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test. This
isolate was phenotypically susceptible to oxacillin and did not contain
the mecA gene by Southern blot hybridization. The
oxacillin agar screen test, the VITEK-1 system, the VITEK-2 system, and
agar dilution showed sensitivities of 99.0, 99.0, 99.5, and 99%,
respectively, and specificities of 98.1, 100, 97.2, and 100%,
respectively. The differences in sensitivity or specificity were not
statistically significant. Oxacillin bactericidal assays showed that
mecA- and PBP 2a-positive S. aureus
isolates that are susceptible to antistaphylococcal beta-lactams by
conventional methods are functionally resistant to oxacillin. We
conclude that the accuracy of the MRSA-Screen latex
agglutination method for detection of PBP 2a approaches the accuracy of
PCR and is more accurate than any susceptibility testing method used
alone for the detection of MRSA.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Kennedy
Building, 6th Floor, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215. Phone: (617) 632-0760. Fax: (617) 632-0766. E-mail:
gsakoula{at}caregroup.harvard.edu.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2001, p. 3946-3951, Vol. 39, No. 11
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.3946-3951.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ikonomidis, A., Michail, G., Vasdeki, A., Labrou, M., Karavasilis, V., Stathopoulos, C., Maniatis, A. N., Pournaras, S.
(2008). In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations of Oxacillin Efficiency against mecA-Positive Oxacillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3905-3908
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jain, A., Agarwal, A., Verma, R. K.
(2008). Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for detection of meticillin-resistant staphylococci. J Med Microbiol
57: 957-961
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pape, J., Wadlin, J., Nachamkin, I.
(2006). Use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA Medium for Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood Cultures.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 2575-2576
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brown, D. F. J., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J., Wren, M. W. D., on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis,
(2005). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother
56: 1000-1018
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miller, M. B., Meyer, H., Rogers, E., Gilligan, P. H.
(2005). Comparison of Conventional Susceptibility Testing, Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a Latex Agglutination Testing, and mecA Real-Time PCR for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 3450-3452
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fernandes, C. J., Fernandes, L. A., Collignon, P., on behalf of the Australian Group on Antimicrobial,
(2005). Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother
55: 506-510
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chapin, K. C., Musgnug, M. C.
(2004). Evaluation of Penicillin Binding Protein 2a Latex Agglutination Assay for Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 1283-1284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fahr, A.-M., Eigner, U., Armbrust, M., Caganic, A., Dettori, G., Chezzi, C., Bertoncini, L., Benecchi, M., Menozzi, M. G.
(2003). Two-Center Collaborative Evaluation of the Performance of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 1135-1142
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Dobinsky, S., Mack, D.
(2002). Rapid Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci with the VITEK 2 System. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 3291-3295
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sakoulas, G., Eliopoulos, G. M., Moellering, R. C. Jr., Wennersten, C., Venkataraman, L., Novick, R. P., Gold, H. S.
(2002). Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) Locus in Geographically Diverse Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
46: 1492-1502
[Abstract]
[Full Text]