Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2001, p. 1859-1864, Vol. 39, No. 5
Department of Microbiology and Department of
Medicine, Vestfold Central Hospital, 3116 Tønsberg,1 and Center for Clinical
Research and Life Insurance Companies' Institute for Medical
Statistics, Ullevål University Hospital, 0407 Oslo,2 Norway
Received 30 October 2000/Returned for modification 30 November
2000/Accepted 2 March 2001
Most publications on the relationship between infection with
Chlamydia pneumoniae and coronary heart disease (CHD)
propose an association, but negative studies are also reported.
Seroepidemiological studies vary in the use of different serological
methods, different cutoff limits, different sampling times in relation
to acute cardiac events, and different clinical stages of CHD. We
wanted to compare three different commercially available methods for
measuring Chlamydia antibodies to see how the choice of
method influenced the prevalence of seropositive individuals in CHD
patients and in healthy individuals and to see if sampling time in
relation to an acute cardiac event or the stage of atherothrombotic
disease influenced the results. Blood samples from 197 CHD patients and
197 individually matched healthy control individuals were tested at
baseline and after 6 months; the mean age was 55 years in both groups,
and 18% were women. Among the CHD patients, 166 were included at a
median of 16 days after an acute cardiac event and 31 had chronic
disease with the latest acute event being >3 months earlier. The
difference in prevalence of antibodies between the CHD patients and the
healthy controls was significant when Chlamydia
lipopolysaccharide antibodies were measured, while no significant
differences between the study groups were observed by the two methods
detecting Chlamydia pneumoniae major outer membrane protein
antibodies. The number of seropositive individuals was quite similar at
inclusion and 6 months later, and no significant differences were
observed between patients with a recent cardiac event and those with a
more remote cardiac event. We conclude that the choice of serological
method is of major importance when evaluating a possible relationship
between C. pneumoniae and CHD.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1859-1864.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Chlamydia pneumoniae Serology:
Importance of Methodology in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and
Healthy Individuals
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, Vestfold Central Hospital, Halfdan Wilhelmsens allé
17, post box 2168, Postterminalen, 3103 Tønsberg, Norway. Phone: 47 33 342000. Fax: 47 33 343939. E-mail: vssmikro{at}online.no.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»