Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2001, p. 1917-1921, Vol. 39, No. 5
Department of Medical Microbiology, Grampian
University Hospitals Trust, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN,
Scotland
Received 18 January 2001/Returned for modification 4 March
2001/Accepted 14 March 2001
Two serotyping schemes (Penner and Laboratory of Enteric Pathogens
[LEP]) based on soluble heat-stable antigens were used to analyze
3,788 Campylobacter sp. isolates. A significant percentage (36.6%) was untypeable using LEP serotyping; greater cross-reaction was also observed. The relative discrimination capabilities of the
techniques were similar. Penner serotyping fulfils more of the
requisite criteria for typing methods.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1917-1921.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Two Methods for Serotyping
Campylobacter spp.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of Medical
Microbiology, Grampian University Hospitals Trust, Foresterhill,
Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, Scotland. Phone: 44-1224-553819. Fax:
44-1224-840632. E-mail: mmb049{at}abdn.ac.uk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|