This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirrett, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reller, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirrett, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reller, L. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2098-2101, Vol. 39, No. 6
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Controlled Comparison of Original Vented Aerobic FAN Medium with New Nonvented BacT/ALERT FA Medium for Culturing Blood

Stanley Mirrett,1,2,* Richard J. Everts,1,2 and L. Barth Reller1,2,3

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center,1 and Departments of Pathology2 and Medicine,3 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Received 7 February 2001/Returned for modification 13 March 2001/Accepted 2 April 2001

To evaluate the performance of BacT/ALERT FA (FA) medium, a new aerobic BacT/ALERT FAN (FAN) medium (Organon Teknika Corporation, Durham, N.C.) that does not require the added cost and inconvenience of a venting unit, we inoculated blood specimens from adult patients with suspected sepsis into an original FAN aerobic culture bottle and an FA bottle. Of 7,745 blood culture sets containing both bottles, 5,256 (68%) met the criteria for adequacy of filling. A total of 466 isolates judged to represent the causes of true infections were recovered from 276 patients; 271 isolates were recovered from both bottles, 82 were recovered from the FAN bottle only, and 113 were recovered from the FA bottle only (P < 0.05). More Burkholderia cepacia isolates (P < 0.01), Candida albicans isolates (P < 0.001), Cryptococcus neoformans isolates (P < 0.01), yeasts overall (P < 0.001), and total microorganisms (P < 0.05) were recovered from FA bottles. Of cultures found to be positive within the first 72 h of incubation, the mean times to detection were almost identical for FAN (20.4 h) and FA (20.7 h) bottles. Of 263 isolates that caused monomicrobic episodes of bloodstream infections, 180 were detected in both bottles, 32 were detected in FAN bottles only, and 51 were detected in FA bottles only (P < 0.05). Of 186 isolates considered to be contaminants, 63 were detected in both media, 64 were detected in FAN bottles only, and 59 were detected in FA bottles only (P was not significant). The number of false-positive results were comparable: 69 (1.3%) in FAN bottles and 56 (1.1%) in FA bottles. However, there were 14 isolates with false-negative results (6 yeasts, 6 nonfermenters, and 1 isolate each of Propionibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci) in FAN bottles, whereas there were none in FA bottles. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the new nonvented FA bottle is superior to the original vented FAN medium for the recovery of B. cepacia and yeasts, especially C. albicans and C. neoformans, and is comparable to FAN medium for other microorganisms.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2902, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 684-2562. Fax: (919) 684-8519. E-mail: stanley.mirrett{at}duke.edu.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2001, p. 2098-2101, Vol. 39, No. 6
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2098-2101.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Flayhart, D., Borek, A. P., Wakefield, T., Dick, J., Carroll, K. C. (2007). Comparison of BACTEC PLUS Blood Culture Media to BacT/Alert FA Blood Culture Media for Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Samples Containing Therapeutic Levels of Antibiotics. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 816-821 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Riley, J. A., Heiter, B. J., Bourbeau, P. P. (2005). Comparative Recovery of Microorganisms from BacT/ALERT Plastic and Glass FA and FN Blood Culture Bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3244-3246 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bourbeau, P. P., Foltzer, M. (2005). Routine Incubation of BacT/ALERT FA and FN Blood Culture Bottles for More than 3 Days May Not Be Necessary. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2506-2509 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Petti, C. A., Mirrett, S., Woods, C. W., Reller, L. B. (2005). Controlled Clinical Comparison of Plastic versus Glass Bottles of BacT/ALERT PF Medium for Culturing Blood from Children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 445-447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Horvath, L. L., George, B. J., Murray, C. K., Harrison, L. S., Hospenthal, D. R. (2004). Direct Comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D Automated Blood Culture Systems for Candida Growth Detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 115-118 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Adler, H., Baumlin, N., Frei, R. (2003). Evaluation of Acridine Orange Staining as a Replacement of Subcultures for BacT/ALERT-Positive, Gram Stain-Negative Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5238-5239 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Everts, R. J., Vinson, E. N., Adholla, P. O., Reller, L. B. (2001). Contamination of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 3393-3394 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krisher, K. K., Gibb, P., Corbett, S., Church, D. (2001). Comparison of the BacT/Alert PF Pediatric FAN Blood Culture Bottle with the Standard Pediatric Blood Culture Bottle, the Pedi-BacT. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 2880-2883 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»