JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alary, M.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alary, M.
Right arrow Articles by Morin, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2508-2512, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2508-2512.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of a Modified Sanitary Napkin as a Sample Self-Collection Device for the Detection of Genital Chlamydial Infection in Women

Michel Alary,1,2,* Céline Poulin,1 Céline Bouchard,3 Michel Fortier,3 Gilles Murray,4 Suzanne Gingras,4 Michel Aubé,5 and Carol Morin5

Direction Régionale de la Santé Publique de Québec,1 Groupe de Recherche en Épidémiologie de l'Université Laval, Centre de Recherche,2 and Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,3 Microbiology,4 and Pathology,5 Hôpital du St-Sacrement du Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada

Received 20 November 2000/Returned for modification 22 February 2001/Accepted 2 May 2001

A modified sanitary napkin was compared with endocervical swab and urine specimens for the detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Endocervical swabs and/or first-catch urine were collected from 510 women at medical or community settings in Quebec City. Participants were also asked to wear a modified sanitary napkin (Ezy-Detek) during 4 consecutive hours and to bring it back to the clinic or mail it to the laboratory. Endocervical and urine specimens were tested using the Cobas Amplicor CT/NG assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions, as were specimens collected with the napkin after adequate preparation. If the PCR test result was positive on the endocervical sample or on any two samples, a woman was considered to be infected. PCR testing results on paired samples were identical for 493 (96.6%) of 510 women. According to the definition given above, 58 (11.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7 to 14.5%) women were infected with C. trachomatis. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR testing on modified sanitary napkin specimens were, respectively, 93.1% (54 of 58; 95% CI, 83.3 to 98.1%) and 98.9% (447 of 452; 95% CI, 97.4 to 99.6%) compared to 81.0% (47 of 58; 95% CI, 68.6 to 90.1%) and 100% (451 of 451; 95% CI, 99.2 to 100%) for urine specimens. The positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 91.5% (54 of 59) and 99.1% (447 of 451) for the sanitary napkin specimens compared to 100% (47 of 47) and 97.6% (451 of 462) for urine samples. These results suggest that a modified sanitary napkin represents an effective noninvasive device for self-collection of specimens to detect urogenital C. trachomatis infection.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centre de Recherche, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement du CHA, 1050, chemin Ste-Foy, Québec (Qc), Canada G1S 4L8. Phone: (418) 682-7387. Fax: (418) 682-7949. E-mail: michel.alary{at}gre.ulaval.ca.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2508-2512, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2508-2512.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.