JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt Gerardo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunt Gerardo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, E. J. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2558-2564, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2558-2564.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Pasteurella multocida subsp. multocida and P. multocida subsp. septica Differentiation by PCR Fingerprinting and alpha -Glucosidase Activity

Sharon Hunt Gerardo,1,* Diane M. Citron,1 Marina C. Claros,2 Helen T. Fernandez,1 and Ellie J. C. Goldstein1,3

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica/UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, California 904041; Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany2; and University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 900953

Received 2 November 2000/Returned for modification 24 January 2001/Accepted 13 March 2001

Pasteurella multocida is composed of three subspecies that are often differentiated by fermentation of sorbitol and dulcitol. We studied 35 dulcitol-negative P. multocida isolates from infected dog and cat bite wounds, 16 of which yielded weak and/or conflicting fermentation reactions in Andrades sorbitol, thus making it difficult to distinguish between the two dulcitol-negative subspecies of P. multocida, i.e., P. multocida subsp. multocida and P. multocida subsp. septica. All isolates and two control strains were further analyzed using a PCR fingerprinting technique with a single primer (M13 core) and assessed for alpha -glucosidase (alpha -Glu) activity. Although the PCR fingerprint patterns and alpha -Glu activity did not correlate well with the sorbitol fermentation reactions, they did correlate well with each other. All strains identified as P. multocida subsp. septica were positive for alpha -Glu activity and exhibited the group I PCR fingerprint profile. All strains categorized as P. multocida subsp. multocida displayed either the group II or group III PCR fingerprint profile; 9 of 11 of these isolates were alpha -Glu negative. These data suggest that both PCR fingerprinting and alpha -Glu activity provide reliable means for differentiating P. multocida subsp. multocida from P. multocida subsp. septica, particularly in strains that produce weak and/or discrepant sorbitol fermentation reactions.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: UCLA School of Dentistry, 53-042G Center for the Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Box 951668, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668. Phone: (310) 825-5455. Fax: (310) 206-5539. E-mail: shuntger{at}dent.ucla.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2558-2564, Vol. 39, No. 7
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2558-2564.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.