Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2687-2689, Vol. 39, No. 7
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve,
Geneva, Switzerland1; Institut
Laboratoriumsdiagnostik, Zentralkrankenhaus, Gauting,
Germany2; Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris,
France3; Roche Molecular Systems Inc.,
Somerville, New Jersey4; and
North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, United
Kingdom5
Received 24 October 2000/Returned for modification 14 December
2000/Accepted 3 May 2001
The introduction of nucleic acid amplification assays into the
clinical laboratory has reduced the time needed to diagnose diseases
caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex (MTBC). However, several mycobacterial species other than those of the MTBC are known to cause disease, especially in
immunocompromised individuals. A screening assay has been developed for
the detection of the major pathogenic mycobacterial species. The assay
utilizes pan-genus primers to amplify mycobacterial DNA and a screening probe (KY493) that detects all major pathogenic mycobacteria. A
multicenter European study was conducted to assess the performance of
the screening probe in the clinical laboratory. The screening probe was
evaluated against individual probes specific for M. tuberculosis, M. avium, and M.
intracellulare, a genus-specific probe with broader species
coverage, and culture. The screening probe had a sensitivity equivalent
to that of the species-specific probes; all specimens positive with any
of the species-specific probes were also positive with the screening
probes. Compared to culture, the sensitivity of the screening probe was
89% (154 of 173) for all culture-positive specimens tested. This value was 89.6% for the genus-specific probe. The screening probe was more
specific than the genus-specific probe. Specificity was 93.9% (661 of
704) compared to culture results alone. The comparable specificity
value for the genus-specific probe was 84.8%. When clinical data were
taken into consideration, the sensitivity of the screening assay was
similar to that of culture (81% versus 76.2%) but the positive
predictive value of the test was lower (76.2% versus 100% for
culture). However, the screening probe was more sensitive than smear
and may be a useful tool in the rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial disease.
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2687-2689.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multicenter Evaluation of a Pathogenic
Mycobacterium Screening Probe
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Service de
Microbiologie, Hopital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, Paris, France. Phone: 00 33 1 42 49 93 48. Fax: 00 33 1 42 49 92 00. E-mail:
jean-louis.herrmann{at}sls.ap-hop-paris.fr.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|