This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Everts, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reller, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Everts, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reller, L. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3393-3394, Vol. 39, No. 9
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3393-3394.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Contamination of Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures

Richard J. Everts,1 Emily N. Vinson,1 Paul O. Adholla,1 and L. Barth Reller1,2,3,*

Clinical Microbiology Laboratory,1 Duke University Medical Center, and Departments of Medicine2 and Pathology,3 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Received 12 October 2000/Returned for modification 1 March 2001/Accepted 19 June 2001

To assess the risk of contamination, we reviewed retrospectively 1,408 matched pairs of simultaneous catheter-drawn and venipuncture blood cultures. Catheter-drawn cultures were equally likely to be truly positive (14.4 versus 13.7%) but more likely to be contaminated (3.8 versus 1.8% [P = 0.001]). Direct venipuncture cultures are preferred.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Box 3938, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 684-6474. Fax: (919) 684-8519. E-mail: relle001{at}mc.duke.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3393-3394, Vol. 39, No. 9
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3393-3394.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dwivedi, S., Bhalla, R., Hoover, D. R., Weinstein, M. P. (2009). Discarding the Initial Aliquot of Blood Does Not Reduce Contamination Rates in Intravenous-Catheter-Drawn Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2950-2951 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Falagas, M. E., Kazantzi, M. S., Bliziotis, I. A. (2008). Comparison of utility of blood cultures from intravascular catheters and peripheral veins: a systematic review and decision analysis. J Med Microbiol 57: 1-8 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hall, K. K., Lyman, J. A. (2006). Updated Review of Blood Culture Contamination. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 788-802 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Weinstein, M. P. (2003). Blood Culture Contamination: Persisting Problems and Partial Progress. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2275-2278 [Full Text]