JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madison, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ridderhof, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madison, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ridderhof, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2002, p. 3976-3979, Vol. 40, No. 11
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.3976-3979.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Multicenter Evaluation of Ethambutol Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Agar Proportion and Radiometric Methods

B. Madison,1* B. Robinson-Dunn,2 I. George,3 W. Gross,4 H. Lipman,1 B. Metchock,1 A. Sloutsky,3 G. Washabaugh,5 G. Mazurek,1 and J. Ridderhof1

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia,1 Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan,2 State Laboratory Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,3 Veterans Administration TB Reference Laboratory, West Haven, Connecticut,4 San Diego County Public Health Laboratory, San Diego, California5

Received 26 April 2002/ Returned for modification 3 July 2002/ Accepted 12 August 2002

Reproducibility of ethambutol (EMB) susceptibility test results for Mycobacterium tuberculosis has always been difficult for a variety of reasons, including the narrow range between the critical breakpoint for EMB resistance and the MIC for susceptible strains, borderline results obtained with the BACTEC 460TB method, the presence of microcolonies determined using the agar proportion (AP) method, and a lack of agreement between these two testing methods. To assess the frequency of these problems, M. tuberculosis drug susceptibility data were collected in a multicenter study involving four laboratories. Resistant, borderline, and susceptible isolates were shared among the laboratories to measure interlaboratory test agreement. Half of isolates determined by BACTEC 460TB to be resistant were determined to be susceptible by the AP method. Isolates determined to be resistant to EMB by both BACTEC 460TB and AP methods were almost always resistant to isoniazid. Results from isolates tested by the BACTEC 460TB method with an EMB concentration of 3.75 µg/ml in addition to the standard 2.5 µg/ml did not show improved agreement by the AP method. While these results do not indicate that the AP method is more accurate than the BACTEC 460TB method, laboratories should not report EMB monoresistance based on BACTEC 460TB results alone. Monoresistance to EMB should only be reported following confirmation by the AP method. Microcolonies could not be confirmed as resistant by the BACTEC 460TB method or by repeat testing with the AP method and do not appear to be indicative of resistance.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, N.E., Mail Stop G-25, Atlanta, GA 30347. Phone: (770) 488-8133. Fax: (770) 488-8282. E-mail: bdm6{at}cdc.gov.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2002, p. 3976-3979, Vol. 40, No. 11
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.3976-3979.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.