This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bergmann, A. R. Articles by Aberer, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bergmann, A. R. Articles by Aberer, E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2002, p. 4581-4584, Vol. 40, No. 12
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4581-4584.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Importance of Sample Preparation for Molecular Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis from Urine

A. R. Bergmann,¹ B. L. Schmidt,² A.-M. Derler,^1, and E. Aberer^1*

Department of Dermatology, Karl Franzens University Hospital, A-8036 Graz,¹ Department of Dermatology, Lainz Hospital, Vienna, Austria²

Received 2 July 2002/ Returned for modification 8 August 2002/ Accepted 24 September 2002

Urine PCR has been used for the diagnosis of Borrelia burgdorferi infection in recent years but has been abandoned because of its low sensitivity and the irreproducibility of the results. Our study aimed to analyze technical details related to sample preparation and detection methods. Crucial for a successful urine PCR were (i) avoidance of the first morning urine sample; (ii) centrifugation at 36,000 x g; and (iii) the extraction method, with only DNAzol of the seven different extraction methods used yielding positive results with patient urine specimens. Furthermore, storage of frozen urine samples at -80°C reduced the sensitivity of a positive urine PCR result obtained with samples from 72 untreated erythema migrans (EM) patients from 85% in the first 3 months to <30% after more than 3 months. Bands were detected at 276 bp on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels after amplification by a nested PCR. The specificity of bands for 32 of 33 samples was proven by hybridization with a GEN-ETI-K-DEIA kit and for a 10 further positive amplicons by sequencing. By using all of these steps to optimize the urine PCR technique, B. burgdorferi infection could be diagnosed by using urine samples from EM patients with a sensitivity (85%) substantially better than that of serological methods (50%). This improved method could be of future importance as an additional laboratory technique for the diagnosis of unclear, unrecognized borrelia infections and diseases possibly related to Lyme borreliosis.

Present address: County Hospital, Feldbach, Austria.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Eisendle, K., Grabner, T., Kutzner, H., Zelger, B. (2008). Possible Role of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Infection in Lichen Sclerosus. Arch Dermatol 144: 591-598 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., Kramer, M. F. (2005). Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 583-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rauter, C., Mueller, M., Diterich, I., Zeller, S., Hassler, D., Meergans, T., Hartung, T. (2005). Critical Evaluation of Urine-Based PCR Assay for Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis. CVI 12: 910-917 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Aguero-Rosenfeld, M. E., Wang, G., Schwartz, I., Wormser, G. P. (2005). Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 484-509 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wagner, E. M., Schmidt, B. L., Bergmann, A. R., Derler, A. M., Aberer, E. (2004). Inability of One-Step Real-Time PCR To Detect Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in Urine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 938-938 [Full Text]