Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2002, p. 641-644, Vol. 40, No. 2
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.02.641-644.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Carole D. Long,1,
Kim R. Smith,2 Jennifer L. Girdner,3 Edward W. Hook III,2 Thomas C. Quinn,3 and Attila T. Lorincz1
Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878,1 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294,2 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 212053
Received 14 March 2001/ Returned for modification 15 September 2001/ Accepted 9 November 2001
Digene's Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) CT/GC, CT-ID, and GC-ID DNA tests were evaluated by comparison to traditional culture methods for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in 669 cervical specimens from high-risk female populations attending two sexually transmitted disease clinics. For detection of either or both infections, the HC2 CT/GC test algorithm had 93.8% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity compared to those of culture. After resolution of discrepant results by direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining or PCR assay, the relative sensitivity and specificity of the HC2 CT/GC test algorithm increased to 94.8 and 99.8%, while the values for culture were 83.6% (McNemar's P value, 0.0062) and 100%, respectively. For detection of the individual pathogens, the relative sensitivities for the HC2 CT-ID and GC-ID tests were 97.2 and 92.2% and the specificities were greater than 99% compared to culture adjucated by DFA staining and PCR. Test performance varied at the two clinics: the HC2 CT/GC algorithm, CT-ID, and GC-ID tests had significantly higher sensitivities (McNemar's P value, <0.05) than that of culture for the population at one clinic as well as for the combined populations. At the other clinic, the HC2 tests performed as well as culture.
Present address: 2808 Grandview Dr., Middletown, MD 21769.
Present address: 7874 Twin Ridge Dr., Glen Burnie, MD 21061.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|