JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arikan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rex, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arikan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rex, J. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1406-1412, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1406-1412.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activity of Nystatin Compared with Those of Liposomal Nystatin, Amphotericin B, and Fluconazole against Clinical Candida Isolates

Sevtap Arikan,1* Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner,1 Mario Lozano-Chiu,1,{dagger} Victor Paetznick,1 David Gordon,2,{ddagger} Tom Wallace,2,§ and John H. Rex1

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for the Study of Emerging and Reemerging Pathogens, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030,1 Aronex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas 773812

Received 20 April 2001/ Returned for modification 18 September 2001/ Accepted 9 January 2002

We investigated the in vitro activity of nystatin and liposomal nystatin against 103 Candida isolates to determine the effect of both time and medium on MICs. We also compared the nystatin MICs with those of amphotericin B and fluconazole. Testing was performed in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A microdilution methodology with RPMI 1640, RPMI 1640 supplemented with glucose to 2% (RPMI-2), and antibiotic medium 3 supplemented with glucose to 2% (AM3). While nystatin MICs were similar to or slightly lower than liposomal nystatin MICs in RPMI 1640 and RPMI-2, they were markedly higher than liposomal nystatin MICs in AM3. Use of AM3 and determination of the MIC after 24 h of incubation provided a slightly wider range of liposomal nystatin MICs (0.06 to >16 µg/ml). Under these conditions, the MICs at which 90% of isolates were inhibited of nystatin and liposomal nystatin were 2 and 1 µg/ml, respectively. Nystatin and liposomal nystatin in general showed good activity against all Candida spp. tested. Although the MICs of nystatin and liposomal nystatin tended to rise in parallel with the amphotericin B MICs, nystatin and liposomal nystatin MICs of 1 to 2 and 0.5 to 1 µg/ml, respectively, were obtained for seven and six, respectively, of nine isolates for which amphotericin B MICs were >=0.25 µg/ml. No correlation between fluconazole and nystatin or liposomal nystatin MICs was observed. As amphotericin B MICs of >=0.25 µg/ml correlate with in vitro resistance, these results suggest that liposomal nystatin might have activity against some amphotericin B-resistant isolates. In vivo testing in animal models is required for clarification of this issue.


* Corresponding author. Present address: Hacettepe University Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, 06100 Ankara, Turkey. Phone: 90 312 3051562. Fax: 90 312 3115250. E-mail: sarikan{at}metu.edu.tr.

{dagger} Present address: Glaxo Wellcome Pharmaceuticals, Departmento de Investigacion, Madrid, Spain.

{ddagger} Present address: MithraTech, Inc., Houston, TX 77030.

§ Present address: Roche Pharmaceuticals, Department of Medical Affairs, Nutley, NJ 07110.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2002, p. 1406-1412, Vol. 40, No. 4
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1406-1412.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.