This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morata, P. Articles by Colmenero, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morata, P. Articles by Colmenero, J. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2003, p. 144-148, Vol. 41, No. 1
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.144-148.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Development and Evaluation of a PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine,¹ Infectious Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department,² Microbiology Service, Carlos Haya University Hospital, Málaga, Spain³

Received 17 June 2002/ Returned for modification 1 September 2002/ Accepted 13 October 2002

In order to overcome some of the limitations of conventional microbiological techniques in the diagnosis of human brucellosis, a simple PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) was developed. After amplification of a 223-bp sequence of a gene that codes for the synthesis of an immunogenetic membrane protein specific for the Brucella genus (BCSP31), the digoxigenin-labeled amplified product was hybridized with a biotinylated capture probe which was complementary to the inner part of the amplicon. The hybrid was captured on streptavidin-coated microtiter plates and detected by using an antidigoxigenin Fab-peroxidase conjugate. The detection limit of the PCR-ELISA in a background of 3.5 µg of human genomic DNA was 10 fg (two bacterial cells). The PCR-ELISA showed an analytical sensitivity higher than that of ethidium bromide staining and equal to that obtained by conventional PCR followed by dot blot hybridization. In 59 peripheral blood samples from 57 consecutive patients with active brucellosis and 113 control samples, the PCR-ELISA was found to be 94.9% sensitive and 96.5% specific, whereas the sensitivity of the blood culture was only 70.1%. Since the assay can be performed in 1 day, is very reproducible, is easily standardized, and avoids the risk of infection in laboratory workers, this PCR-ELISA seems to be a practical and reliable tool for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mukherjee, F., Jain, J., Patel, V., Nair, M. (2007). Multiple genus-specific markers in PCR assays improve the specificity and sensitivity of diagnosis of brucellosis in field animals. J Med Microbiol 56: 1309-1316 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mitka, S., Anetakis, C., Souliou, E., Diza, E., Kansouzidou, A. (2007). Evaluation of Different PCR Assays for Early Detection of Acute and Relapsing Brucellosis in Humans in Comparison with Conventional Methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1211-1218 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Al-Nakkas, A., Mustafa, A. S., Wright, S. G (2005). Large-scale evaluation of a single-tube nested PCR for the laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait. J Med Microbiol 54: 727-730 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Colmenero, J D, Queipo-Ortuno, M I, Reguera, J M, Baeza, G, Salazar, J A, Morata, P (2005). Real time polymerase chain reaction: a new powerful tool for the diagnosis of neurobrucellosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 76: 1025-1027 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pappas, G., Akritidis, N., Bosilkovski, M., Tsianos, E. (2005). Brucellosis. NEJM 352: 2325-2336 [Full Text]  
• Probert, W. S., Schrader, K. N., Khuong, N. Y., Bystrom, S. L., Graves, M. H. (2004). Real-Time Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Brucella spp., B. abortus, and B. melitensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1290-1293 [Abstract] [Full Text]