This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Trudel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Trudel, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2003, p. 237-241, Vol. 41, No. 1
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.237-241.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Detection and Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar Isolates in Clinical Samples by PCR and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Patrick Gonin* and Louise Trudel

Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada H9X 3R5

Received 3 July 2002/ Returned for modification 25 August 2002/ Accepted 14 October 2002

Differential diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica (pathogenic) and Entamoeba dispar (nonpathogenic), which are two morphologically identical species of amebae, is essential both for treatment decision and public health knowledge. The study reported here was designed to choose a reference differentiation technique. Stool samples (n = 95) were tested by microscopy, TechLab enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and an in-house PCR. The target for the PCR amplification was a small region (135 bp) of the SSU rRNA selected to increase the sensitivity of the test. Sixty-eight specimens tested positive by PCR: 2 for E. histolytica and 66 for E. dispar. For detection of E. dispar, ELISA performance was lower than that of microscopy in this reference context, while PCR was much more sensitive than microscopy. Given the low proportion of E. histolytica cases, test performance for this species is difficult to assess. However, for differentiation, PCR performed well on simulated samples, while ELISA gave a discordant result for one of the two samples PCR positive for E. histolytica during the study. This report also confirms that E. dispar infection is significantly higher among travelers and underlines the possibility of acquiring E. histolytica infection in regions that are not areas of endemicity. Because of its lower sensitivity, the interest of ELISA for Entamoeba detection and differentiation in stools seems questionable in nontropical regions. On the other hand, results suggest that PCR should be useful as a reference test for sensitive differentiation of both species and to contribute to physicians' decision in treatment of E. histolytica- or E. dispar-infected patients.

* Corresponding author. Present address: Généthon III, 1 bis, rue de l'International, 91000 Evry, France. Phone: 33-1-6947-1021. Fax: 33-1-6077-2872. E-mail: gonin{at}genethon.fr.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2003, p. 237-241, Vol. 41, No. 1
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.237-241.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Liang, S.-Y., Chan, Y.-H., Hsia, K.-T., Lee, J.-L., Kuo, M.-C., Hwa, K.-Y., Chan, C.-W., Chiang, T.-Y., Chen, J.-S., Wu, F.-T., Ji, D.-D. (2009). Development of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Detection of Entamoeba histolytica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1892-1895 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ayed, S. B., Aoun, K., Maamouri, N., Abdallah, R. B., Bouratbine, A. (2008). First Molecular Identification of Entamoeba moshkovskii in Human Stool Samples in Tunisia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79: 706-707 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stark, D., van Hal, S., Fotedar, R., Butcher, A., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2008). Comparison of Stool Antigen Detection Kits to PCR for Diagnosis of Amebiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1678-1681 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fotedar, R., Stark, D., Beebe, N., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2007). Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 511-532 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • STARK, D., FOTEDAR, R., VAN HAL, S., BEEBE, N., MARRIOTT, D., ELLIS, J. T., HARKNESS, J. (2007). PREVALENCE OF ENTERIC PROTOZOA IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV)-POSITIVE AND HIV-NEGATIVE MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN FROM SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 549-552 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, Z., Vora, G. J., Stenger, D. A. (2004). Detection and Genotyping of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum by Oligonucleotide Microarray. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3262-3271 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kuboki, N., Inoue, N., Sakurai, T., Di Cello, F., Grab, D. J., Suzuki, H., Sugimoto, C., Igarashi, I. (2003). Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Detection of African Trypanosomes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 5517-5524 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»