JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapin, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Musgnug, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapin, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Musgnug, M. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2003, p. 4751-4754, Vol. 41, No. 10
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4751-4754.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Direct Susceptibility Testing of Positive Blood Cultures by Using Sensititre Broth Microdilution Plates

Kimberle C. Chapin* and Michael C. Musgnug

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts 01805

Received 7 May 2003/ Returned for modification 19 June 2003/ Accepted 11 July 2003

Traditional susceptibility testing of blood cultures requires overnight incubation in order to obtain isolated colonies. Susceptibility results can be reported up to 24 h sooner by using a bacterial pellet from the blood culture broth. This study evaluated the accuracy of direct susceptibility testing from positive ESP blood culture broths by using Sensititre broth microdilution plates compared to testing with isolated colonies. Practical inclusion criteria were applied to gram-positive organisms to avoid reporting susceptibilities for probable contaminants. All gram-negative organisms were tested directly. An aliquot of the blood culture was centrifuged, and the resulting pellet was used to make a 0.5 McFarland suspension. Microdilution plates were inoculated and interpreted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Colony counts were performed to ensure proper colony density was achieved. A total of 199 patient and seeded blood cultures were evaluated for both essential (within ±1 twofold dilution) and categorical (sensitive, intermediate, or resistant) agreement. Testing of 93 gram-positive isolates (1,214 antimicrobial agent-organism combinations) yielded 98% essential agreement and categorical error rates of 0.3% minor, no major (false resistance), and 1.7% very major (false susceptibility) errors. For 106 gram-negative isolates (1,828 antimicrobial agent-organism combinations), the essential agreement was 99%. Categorical error rates were 0.5, 0, and 2.0% for minor, major, and very major errors, respectively. Performance was comparable for both gram-positive and gram-negative isolates, as well as for both aerobic and anaerobic media. Using this direct testing methodology, reliable susceptibility results can be reported to physicians 24 h sooner, allowing earlier appropriate modification of antimicrobial therapy.


* Corresponding author. Present address: Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy St., Department of Pathology, Providence, RI 02903. Phone: (401) 444-5057. Fax: (401) 444-8514. E-mail: kchapin{at}lifespan.org.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2003, p. 4751-4754, Vol. 41, No. 10
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4751-4754.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.