JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majoros, L.
Right arrow Articles by Szabó, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majoros, L.
Right arrow Articles by Szabó, B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2003, p. 5250-5253, Vol. 41, No. 11
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5250-5253.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Restriction Enzyme Analysis of Ribosomal DNA Shows that Candida inconspicua Clinical Isolates Can Be Misidentified as Candida norvegensis with Traditional Diagnostic Procedures

L. Majoros,1* G. Kardos,1 Á. Belák,2 A. Maráz,2 L. Asztalos,3 E. Csánky,4 Z. Barta,5 and B. Szabó1

Department of Medical Microbiology,1 1st Department of Surgery,3 Department of Pulmonology,4 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen,5 Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Food Science, St. István University, Budapest, Hungary2

Received 20 February 2003/ Returned for modification 24 April 2003/ Accepted 28 July 2003

We identified 29 yeast isolates from 22 patients using the API ID32C panel. Twenty-eight of these isolates were Candida norvegensis and one was C. inconspicua. Although C. norvegensis is considered a pseudohypha-producing species, only one isolate produced pseudohyphae. Restriction enzyme analysis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA with four different enzymes proved that all isolates were C. inconspicua.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Hungary. Phone: 52-411-717. Fax: 52-414-948. E-mail: major{at}jaguar.dote.hu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2003, p. 5250-5253, Vol. 41, No. 11
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5250-5253.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.